Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36997890›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Acceptance of vaccination against pertussis, COVID-19 and influenza during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.

Veja Widdershoven, Rianne P Reijs, Annika Eskes, Amanja Verhaegh-Haasnoot, Christian J P A Hoebe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Veja WiddershovenDepartment of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. veja.widdershoven@ggdzl.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1951-0866
Rianne P ReijsDepartment of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Annika EskesDepartment of Youth Health Care, Public Health Service Hollands Noorden, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Amanja Verhaegh-HaasnootDepartment of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases and Environmental Health, Living Lab Public Health South, South Limburg Public Health Service, PO Box 33, 6400 AA, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Christian J P A HoebeDepartment of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLGGD Zuid Limburg · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to assess the uptake of maternal pertussis and COVID-19 vaccination and the intention towards accepting the maternal influenza vaccination. Insights into different socio-demographic factors related to maternal vaccination coverage might help to address vaccine acceptance and improve maternal vaccine uptake in the future.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey among pregnant women and recent mothers, up to 6 months post-partum. The primary outcome measures of this study were behaviour for maternal pertussis and COVID-19 vaccination, and maternal influenza vaccination intention. Associations between socio-demographic factors and maternal pertussis vaccination and maternal COVID-19 vaccination behaviour; and socio-demographic factors and maternal influenza vaccination intention were assessed using binary logistic regression analyses.

resultsIn total 1361 respondents filled out the questionnaire. Almost all women (95%) were vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy, while almost two-third were vaccinated against COVID-19 during pregnancy (58%) and almost one-third (28%) had a positive intention towards receiving the maternal influenza vaccination. Results show that young maternal age and low education level were associated with lower maternal vaccination acceptance.

conclusionVaccination campaigns focusing on the severity of diseases that are prevented, are needed to increase maternal vaccine acceptance in younger and low-educated pregnant women. We expect that differences in vaccination coverage between the three maternal vaccinations might partly be explained by existing recommendations, campaigns and whether the vaccination is part of the national immunisation program.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesPregnancy Complications, InfectiousWhooping CoughCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPertussis VaccinePregnancyPregnant PeopleVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesPertussis VaccineCOVID-19 vaccinesInfluenza vaccinesPregnancyVaccination CoverageVaccination refusalWhooping cough

Identifiers

PMID36997890
PMCPMC10061389
OpenAlexW4361268306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.