Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36997857›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2023

Assessment of antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation of Enterococcus species isolated from different pig farm environments in Poland.

Katarzyna Grudlewska-Buda, Krzysztof Skowron, Justyna Bauza-Kaszewska, Anna Budzyńska, Natalia Wiktorczyk-Kapischke, Monika Wilk, Magdalena Wujak, Zbigniew Paluszak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence of Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Comprehensive Study of Antibiotic Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester attenuatesJournal of medicine and life · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katarzyna Grudlewska-BudaDepartment of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
Krzysztof SkowronDepartment of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland. skowron238@wp.pl.
Justyna Bauza-KaszewskaDepartment of Microbiology and Food Technology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Anna BudzyńskaDepartment of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
Natalia Wiktorczyk-KapischkeDepartment of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
Monika WilkDepartment of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
Magdalena WujakDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
Zbigniew PaluszakDepartment of Microbiology and Food Technology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PLAGH University of Krakow · PLBydgoszcz University of Science and Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnteroccocus spp. are human opportunistic pathogens causing a variety of serious and life-threating infections in humans, including urinary tract infection, endocarditis, skin infection and bacteraemia. Farm animals and direct contact with them are important sources of Enterococcus faecalis (EFA) and Enterococcus faecium (EFM) infections among farmers, veterinarians and individuals working in breeding farms and abattoirs. The spread of antibiotic-resistant strains is one of the most serious public health concerns, as clinicians will be left without therapeutic options for the management of enterococcal infections. The aim of the study was to evaluate the occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of EFA and EFM strains isolated from a pig farm environment and to determine the biofilm formation ability of identified Enterococcus spp. strains.

resultsA total numer of 160 enterococcal isolates were obtained from 475 samples collected in total (33.7%). Among them, 110 of genetically different strains were identified and classified into EFA (82; 74.5%) and EFM (28; 25.5%). Genetic similarity analysis revealed the presence of 7 and 1 clusters among the EFA and EFM strains, respectively. The highest percentage of EFA strains (16; 19.5%) was resistant to high concentrations of gentamicin. Among the EFM strains, the most frequent strains were resistant to ampicillin and high concentrations of gentamicin (5 each; 17.9%). Six (7.3%) EFA and 4 (14.3%) EFM strains showed vancomycin resistance (VRE - Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus). Linezolid resistance was found in 2 strains of each species. The multiplex PCR analysis was performed to identify the vancomycin resistant enterococci. vanB, vanA and vanD genotypes were detected in 4, 1 and 1 EFA strains, respectively. Four EFA VRE-strains in total, 2 with the vanA and 2 with the vanB genotypes, were identified. The biofilm analysis revealed that all vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis and E. faecium strains demonstrated a higher biofilm-forming capacity, as compared to the susceptible strains. The lowest cell count (5.31 log CFU / cm

conclusionsThe irrational use of antibiotics in agriculture and veterinary practice is considered to be one of the key reasons for the rapid spread of antibiotic resistance among microorganisms. Owing to the fact that piggery environment can be a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance and transmission route of antimicrobial resistance genes from commensal zoonotic bacteria to clinical strains, it is of a great importance to public health to monitor trends in this biological phenomenon.

Indexed as

Enterococcus faeciumGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsVancomycin-Resistant EnterococciAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsEnterococcus faecalisFarmsGentamicinsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolandSwineVancomycinVancomycin ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsGentamicinsVancomycinAntibiotic resistanceBiofilm formationEnterococcus spp.MIC valuesPig farmsVRE

Identifiers

PMID36997857
PMCPMC10061711
OpenAlexW4361276671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.