Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36997843›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2023

Is the right way to go in between? : Rimegepant as needed provides preventive benefit. A comment on: monthly migraine days, tablet utilization, and quality of life associated with rimegepant-post hoc results from an open label safety study (BHV3000-201).

Andreas R Gantenbein, Andreas Kleinschmidt

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas R GantenbeinPain and Research Department, ZURZACH Care, Quellenstrasse 34, CH-5330, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland. andreas.gantenbein@zurzachcare.ch.
Andreas KleinschmidtDivision of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Geneva (HUG) and Medical Faculty Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stiftung für Forschung in Spätantike und Mittelalter HR. Sennhauser · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the study by Johnston et al., gepants were meant to be taken to treat emergent migraine. It is tempting to speculate what the effect would be if patients were instructed to take a gepant as needed (PRN) or even prior to headache onset. While the latter sounds irrational at first glance, several studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients are quite proficient in predicting (or simply due to premonitory symptoms noting) their migraine attacks prior to the onset of actual headache. The study by Johnston et al. provides food for thought along these lines and should encourage us to further investigate flexible patient-controlled CGRP blocking as a third, intermediate and potentially cost-effective avenue between acute/rescue treatment and prevention/prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersQuality of LifeCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsHeadacheHumansPiperidinesPyridinesTabletsCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsPiperidinesPyridinesrimegepant sulfateTabletsAcuteAnti-CGRPAs neededMedication overuse headacheMigraineProphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID36997843
PMCPMC10061740
OpenAlexW4361273016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.