Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36997837›Full record

SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2023

Reno-protective effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mohamed T Abuelazm, Ahmed Ghanem, Amit Johanis, Abdelrahman Mahmoud, Abdul Rhman Hassan, Basant E Katamesh, Mostafa Atef Amin, Basel Abdelazeem

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed T AbuelazmFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Ahmed GhanemCardiology Department, The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, CA, USA.
Amit JohanisFaculty of Medicine, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Abdelrahman MahmoudFaculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Abdul Rhman HassanFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt. abdulrhman.mohamed96@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2056-1361
Basant E KatameshFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Mostafa Atef AminFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Basel AbdelazeemDepartment of Internal Medicine, McLaren Health Care, Flint, MI, USA.
Tanta University · EGCairo University · EGCreighton University · USMcLaren Health Care · USMinia University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThere is currently no FDA-approved medical therapy for delayed graft function (DGF). Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has multiple reno-protective effects preventing ischemic reperfusion injury, DGF, and acute kidney injury. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the reno-protective effects of perioperative DEX during renal transplantation.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL until June 8th, 2022. We used the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference for continuous outcomes; both presented with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We registered our protocol in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022338898.

resultsWe included four RCTs with 339 patients. Pooled risk ratio found no difference between DEX and placebo in reducing DGF (RR: 0.58 with 95% CI [0.34, 1.01], p = 0.05) and acute rejection (RR: 0.88 with 95% CI [0.52, 1.49], p = 0.63). However, DEX improved short-term creatinine on day 1 (MD: - 0.76 with 95% CI [- 1.23, - 0.3], p = 0.001) and day 2 (MD: - 0.28 with 95% CI [- 0.5, - 0.07], p = 0.01); and blood urea nitrogen on day 2 (MD: - 10.16 with 95% CI [- 17.21, - 3.10], p = 0.005) and day 3 (MD: - 6.72 with 95% CI [- 12.85, - 0.58], p = 0.03).

conclusionAlthough there is no difference between DEX and placebo regarding reducing DGF and acute rejection after kidney transplantation, there may be some evidence that it has reno-protective benefits because we found statistically significant improvement in the short-term serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels. More trials are required to investigate the long-term reno-protective effects of DEX.

Indexed as

DexmedetomidineKidney TransplantationHumansKidneyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDexmedetomidineDEXDexmedetomidineKidney transplantationMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36997837
PMCPMC10499682
OpenAlexW4362457818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.