ReviewEye (London, England)2023
Randomized controlled trials in central serous chorioretinopathy: A review.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral eplerenone in first-episode acute central serous chorioretinopathy: results of a double-masked randomized trial.International ophthalmology · 2026Trial
- Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Versus Oral Spironolactone in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Trial
- Article
- Off-label intravitreal brolucizumab and bevacizumab for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Bilateral Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Associated With Tuberculosis in a Female Patient.Cureus · 2025Article
- Oscillatory photodynamic therapy in central serous chorioretinopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Radiomics-Based OCT Analysis of Choroid Reveals Biomarkers of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Article
- Conditional Inhibition of Eip75B Eliminates the Effects of Mating and Mifepristone on Lifespan in FemaleCells · 2024Article
- Effective Focal Laser Photocoagulation for Persistent Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Forgotten Technique.Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), a common chorioretinal disease, presents with a myriad of manifestations. Acute CSCR presents with localized neurosensory detachment whereas chronic CSCR may show widespread retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) changes, chronic shallow subretinal fluid, and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) suggestive of a variable natural history leading to suboptimal visual outcomes. Even though multiple treatment options including laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy, micropulse laser, anti-vascular endothelial growth factors, and systemic drugs (spironolactone, eplerenone, melatonin, mifepristone) are available, there is an absence of any standardized treatment protocol or gold standard treatment modality. Moreover, their performance compared to observation especially in acute CSCR is still debatable. Compared to other chorioretinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular oedema, and retinal vein occlusion, there is a relative dearth of randomized controlled trials in CSCR. Multiple inconsistencies including reliance on history of disease duration, variable inclusion criteria/disease descriptors/study endpoints, and availability of multiple treatment modalities lead to difficulties in designing RCTs. A consensus-based treatment protocol, therefore, is still elusive. We reviewed the literature and compiled the list of papers published to date, wherein we analyse and compare the inclusion criteria, imaging modalities, study endpoints, study duration, and study results. Correcting these discrepancies and deficiencies will help standardize future study designs, facilitating a next step toward a standardized treatment protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.