Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36997717›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2023

The effect of auditory valence on subsequent visual semantic processing.

Chuanji Gao, William M Hayes, Melissa LaPierre, Svetlana V Shinkareva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chuanji GaoDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29201, USA.
William M HayesDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29201, USA.
Melissa LaPierreDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29201, USA.
Svetlana V ShinkarevaDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29201, USA. shinkareva@sc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion influences many cognitive processes and plays an important role in our daily life. Previous studies focused on the effects of arousal on subsequent cognitive processing, but the effect of valence on subsequent semantic processing is still not clear. The present study examined the effect of auditory valence on subsequent visual semantic processing when controlling for arousal. We used instrumental music clips varying in valence while matching in arousal to induce valence states and asked participants to make natural or man-made judgements on subsequent neutral objects. We found that positive and negative valences similarly impaired subsequent semantic processing compared with neutral valence. The linear ballistic accumulator model analyses showed that the valence effects can be attributed to drift rate differences, suggesting that the effects are likely related to attentional selection. Our findings are consistent with a motivated attention model, indicating comparable attentional capture by both positive and negative valences in modulating subsequent cognitive processes.

Indexed as

Brain MappingSemanticsAttentionEmotionsHumansVisual PerceptionCross-modal effectsEmotionLinear ballistic modelSemantic processingValence

Identifiers

PMID36997717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.