ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2023
How the conception of control influences our understanding of actions.
Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxytocinergic modulation of speech production-a double-blind placebo-controlled fMRI study.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2023Trial
- Dynamic salience as a basis for behavioural meta-malleability.Royal Society open science · 2026Review
- Effects of coda consonant on syllable-initial Voice Onset Time (VOT) in English and French: The Syllable-Body Stiffness Hypothesis.Journal of phonetics · 2026Article
- Editorial: Neural mechanisms of sensory-motor integration in manual tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Article
- Goals rather than predictions determine the sense of agency.iScience · 2025Article
- Human intergroup coordination in a hierarchical multi-agent sensorimotor task arises from concurrent co-optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Aligning brain and behavior.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2025Article
- NSF DARE-transforming modeling in neurorehabilitation: perspectives and opportunities from US funding agencies.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Deep kinematic inference affords efficient and scalable control of bodily movements.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wilful movement requires neural control. Commonly, neural computations are thought to generate motor commands that bring the musculoskeletal system - that is, the plant - from its current physical state into a desired physical state. The current state can be estimated from past motor commands and from sensory information. Modelling movement on the basis of this concept of plant control strives to explain behaviour by identifying the computational principles for control signals that can reproduce the observed features of movements. From an alternative perspective, movements emerge in a dynamically coupled agent-environment system from the pursuit of subjective perceptual goals. Modelling movement on the basis of this concept of perceptual control aims to identify the controlled percepts and their coupling rules that can give rise to the observed characteristics of behaviour. In this Perspective, we discuss a broad spectrum of approaches to modelling human motor control and their notions of control signals, internal models, handling of sensory feedback delays and learning. We focus on the influence that the plant control and the perceptual control perspective may have on decisions when modelling empirical data, which may in turn shape our understanding of actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36997716What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.