ArticleScientific reports2023
Assessing the utility of a sliding-windows deep neural network approach for risk prediction of trauma patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Prediction of Day Mortality in Patients With Trauma Using a Hybrid Neural Network Model: Model Development and Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- MIASurviveMTP: Machine learning for immediate assessment and survival prediction after massive transfusion protocol.PloS one · 2025Article
- Prospective and External Validation of Machine Learning Models for Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Acutely Admitted Patients Using Blood Tests.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The risks of post trauma complications are regulated by the injury, comorbidities, and the clinical trajectories, yet prediction models are often limited to single time-point data. We hypothesize that deep learning prediction models can be used for risk prediction using additive data after trauma using a sliding windows approach. Using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS TQIP) database, we developed three deep neural network models, for sliding-windows risk prediction. Output variables included early- and late mortality and any of 17 complications. As patients moved through the treatment trajectories, performance metrics increased. Models predicted early- and late mortality with ROC AUCs ranging from 0.980 to 0.994 and 0.910 to 0.972, respectively. For the remaining 17 complications, the mean performance ranged from 0.829 to 0.912. In summary, the deep neural networks achieved excellent performance in the sliding windows risk stratification of trauma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.