ReviewNPJ microgravity2023
Human behavior and performance in deep space exploration: next challenges and research gaps.
Review in NPJ microgravity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interpersonal relationships as coping mechanisms during bed rest: a thematic synthesis literature review.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Pooled it
- Cardiovascular risks and hazards associated with deep space exploration.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Social interactions in isolated, confined, and extreme environments: A study of Antarctic winter teams using wearable sensors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Review
- Evaluating the impact of mission architecture on crew dynamics in space exploration.NPJ microgravity · 2026Article
- Integrative focus on the space exposome-integrome: physiological challenges and practical limits of countermeasures beyond low Earth orbit.NPJ microgravity · 2025Review
- Human and space ethology as a methodology-based solution for interdisciplinary research.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Supporting the Mind in Space: Psychological Tools for Long-Duration Missions.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Automated Psychotherapy in a Spaceflight Environment: Advantages, Drawbacks, and Unknowns.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Ethical considerations for the age of non-governmental space exploration.Nature communications · 2024Review
- Resonance tuning of rhythmic movements is disrupted at short time scales: A centrifuge study.iScience · 2024Article
- Long-term space missions' effects on the human organism: what we do know and what requires further research.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Microgravity induces overconfidence in perceptual decision-making.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As space exploration missions move from low orbit to distant destinations, including the Moon and Mars, new psychological, behavioral, and team challenges will arise. This manuscript represents an up-to-date white paper developed by European experts invited by the European Space Agency (ESA), mapping unfilled research gaps related to the psychology of space exploration, considering the incoming human missions, and accounting for the available scientific knowledge. ESA created the expert team and facilitated its work, but the team was completely independent in terms of contents. The white paper considers basic issues of adaptation, pre-, during-, and post-mission experiences, and possible countermeasures to be developed and tested. The resulting integrative map provides a guide for researchers that are interested in conducting research in the support of future space exploration endeavors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.