Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36997258›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Using the Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix System for population segmentation in a hospital-based adult patient population in Singapore.

Joshua Kuan Tan, Xiaojin Zhang, Dawn Cheng, Ian Yi Onn Leong, Chia Siong Wong, Jeannie Tey, Shu Ching Loh, Eugene Fidelis Soh, Wei Yen Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joshua Kuan TanOffice of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge (OCEAN), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4518-0477
Xiaojin ZhangOffice of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge (OCEAN), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Dawn ChengPopulation Health Office, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Ian Yi Onn LeongDivision of Central Health, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Chia Siong WongPopulation Health Office, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Jeannie TeyPlanning and Development, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Shu Ching LohDivision of Central Health, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Eugene Fidelis SohExecutive Office, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Wei Yen LimOffice of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge (OCEAN), Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore Weiyen_LIM@ttsh.com.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePopulation health management involves risk characterisation and patient segmentation. Almost all population segmentation tools require comprehensive health information spanning the full care continuum. We assessed the utility of applying the ACG System as a population risk segmentation tool using only hospital data.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingTertiary hospital in central Singapore.

participants100 000 randomly selected adult patients from 1 January to 31 December 2017.

interventionHospital encounters, diagnoses codes and medications prescribed to the participants were used as input data to the ACG System. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital costs, admission episodes and mortality of these patients in the subsequent year (2018) were used to assess the utility of ACG System outputs such as resource utilisation bands (RUBs) in stratifying patients and identifying high hospital care users.

resultsPatients placed in higher RUBs had higher prospective (2018) healthcare costs, and were more likely to have healthcare costs in the top five percentile, to have three or more hospital admissions, and to die in the subsequent year. A combination of RUBs and ACG System generated rank probability of high healthcare costs, age and gender that had good discriminatory ability for all three outcomes, with area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.827, 0.889 and 0.876, respectively. Application of machine learning methods improved AUCs marginally by about 0.02 in predicting the top five percentile of healthcare costs and death in the subsequent year.

conclusionA population stratification and risk prediction tool can be used to appropriately segment populations in a hospital patient population even with incomplete clinical data.

Indexed as

Diagnosis-Related GroupsAdultHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSingaporeTertiary Care Centershealth economicshealth services administration & managementrisk management

Identifiers

PMID36997258
PMCPMC10069494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.