ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023
Machine learning classifiers for electrode selection in the design of closed-loop neuromodulation devices for episodic memory improvement.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Insights Into Smart Bioelectronics in Digital Health Care (2020-2024): Topic Modeling Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Review
- Neural mechanisms and neuromodulation therapies for non-suicidal self-injury.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Review
- Functional segregation of rostral and caudal hippocampus in associative memory.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- High-gamma and beta bursts in the left supramarginal gyrus can differentiate verbal memory states and performance.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Successful neuromodulation approaches to alter episodic memory require closed-loop stimulation predicated on the effective classification of brain states. The practical implementation of such strategies requires prior decisions regarding electrode implantation locations. Using a data-driven approach, we employ support vector machine (SVM) classifiers to identify high-yield brain targets on a large data set of 75 human intracranial electroencephalogram subjects performing the free recall (FR) task. Further, we address whether the conserved brain regions provide effective classification in an alternate (associative) memory paradigm along with FR, as well as testing unsupervised classification methods that may be a useful adjunct to clinical device implementation. Finally, we use random forest models to classify functional brain states, differentiating encoding versus retrieval versus non-memory behavior such as rest and mathematical processing. We then test how regions that exhibit good classification for the likelihood of recall success in the SVM models overlap with regions that differentiate functional brain states in the random forest models. Finally, we lay out how these data may be used in the design of neuromodulation devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.