Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36996901›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2023

Fabrication of 3D-Printed Implant for Two-Stage Ear Reconstruction Surgery and Its Clinical Application.

Oh Young Joo, Tae Ho Kim, Young Seok Kim, Tai Suk Roh, Eun-Ju Lee, Jin-Hyung Shim, Hyun Woo Cho, In Sik Yun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Oh Young JooDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Institute of Human Tissue Restoration, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5736-4671
Tae Ho KimDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9002-6719
Young Seok KimDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0981-2107
Tai Suk RohDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8681-159X
Eun-Ju LeeResearch Institute of T&R Biofab Co.,Ltd, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8082-5330
Jin-Hyung ShimResearch Institute of T&R Biofab Co.,Ltd, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5407-9020
Hyun Woo ChoIpche Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1799-8060
In Sik YunDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. eqatom@yuhs.ac.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-7047
Yonsei University · KRNC bit (South Korea) · KRPlastic Surgery Hospital · CNSeverance Hospital · KRTech University of Korea · KR

Funding

Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology P0008811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEar reconstruction is one of the most difficult areas in the field of reconstructive surgery. Due to limitations of the current practice, a novel method of auricular reconstruction is needed. Major advancements in three-dimensional (3D) printing technique have rendered the process of ear reconstruction more favorable. Herein, we present our experience in designing and clinically using 3D implants in both 1st and 2nd stage ear reconstruction surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsAfter obtaining 3D CT data from each patient, a 3D geometric ear model was created using mirroring and segmentation processes. The 3D-printed implant design resembles but does not exactly match the normal ear shape, and can be inserted in harmony with the currently used surgical technique. The 2nd stage implant was designed to minimize dead space and support the posterior ear helix. The 3D implants were finally fabricated with a 3D printing system and used in ear reconstruction surgery in our institute.

resultsThe 3D implants were manufactured for application to the currently used two-stage technique while maintaining the shape of the patient's normal ear. The implants were successfully used for ear reconstruction surgery in microtia patients. A few months later, the 2nd stage implant was used in the 2nd stage operation.

conclusionThe authors were able to design, fabricate, and apply patient-specific 3D-printed ear implants for 1st and 2nd stage ear reconstruction surgeries. This design, combined with 3D bioprinting technique, may be a future alternative for ear reconstruction.

Indexed as

Congenital MicrotiaPlastic Surgery ProceduresHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalProstheses and Implants3D printingauricular cartilageAuricular reconstructionscaffold

Identifiers

PMID36996901
PMCPMC10067794
OpenAlexW4361012797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.