ArticleYonsei medical journal2023
Fabrication of 3D-Printed Implant for Two-Stage Ear Reconstruction Surgery and Its Clinical Application.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative tissue engineering strategies for auricular regeneration in microtia: Current advances and future perspectives.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Review
- Systematic Review on Microtia: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Literature Review on Advancements and Challenges in 3D Bioprinting of Human Organs: Ear, Skin, and Bone.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- The Promise and Challenges of Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering.Micromachines · 2024Article
- 3D Bioprinting in Cancer Modeling and Biomedicine: From Print Categories to Biological Applications.ACS omega · 2024Review
- One-Year Results of Ear Reconstruction with 3D Printed Implants.Yonsei medical journal · 2024Article
- 3D printing tissue-engineered scaffolds for auricular reconstruction.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Characterization of Acellular Cartilage Matrix-Sodium Alginate Scaffolds in Various Proportions.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2024Article
- The Creation of an Average 3D Model of the Human Cartilaginous Nasal Septum and Its Biomimetic Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEar reconstruction is one of the most difficult areas in the field of reconstructive surgery. Due to limitations of the current practice, a novel method of auricular reconstruction is needed. Major advancements in three-dimensional (3D) printing technique have rendered the process of ear reconstruction more favorable. Herein, we present our experience in designing and clinically using 3D implants in both 1st and 2nd stage ear reconstruction surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter obtaining 3D CT data from each patient, a 3D geometric ear model was created using mirroring and segmentation processes. The 3D-printed implant design resembles but does not exactly match the normal ear shape, and can be inserted in harmony with the currently used surgical technique. The 2nd stage implant was designed to minimize dead space and support the posterior ear helix. The 3D implants were finally fabricated with a 3D printing system and used in ear reconstruction surgery in our institute.
resultsThe 3D implants were manufactured for application to the currently used two-stage technique while maintaining the shape of the patient's normal ear. The implants were successfully used for ear reconstruction surgery in microtia patients. A few months later, the 2nd stage implant was used in the 2nd stage operation.
conclusionThe authors were able to design, fabricate, and apply patient-specific 3D-printed ear implants for 1st and 2nd stage ear reconstruction surgeries. This design, combined with 3D bioprinting technique, may be a future alternative for ear reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.