ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023
Benchmarking the Drude Polarizable Force Field Using the r(GACC) Tetranucleotide.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspective - RNA Dynamics Today and Tomorrow.Journal of molecular biology · 2026Review
- The Kink-Turn 7 Motif: An Additional Test for RNA Force Field Performance.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Can We Ever Develop an Ideal RNA Force Field? Lessons Learned from Simulations of the UUCG RNA Tetraloop and Other Systems.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Refining Ligand Poses in RNA/Ligand Complexes of Pharmaceutical Relevance: A Perspective by QM/MM Simulations and NMR Measurements.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Assessment of Force-Field Performance in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA/RNA Hybrid Duplexes.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Embracing exascale computing in nucleic acid simulations.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024Review
- Energy, water, and protein folding: A molecular dynamics-based quantitative inventory of molecular interactions and forces that make proteins stable.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polarizable force fields, in particular, the Drude polarizable force field (Drude FF), may hold the key to more accurately modeling biomolecules with molecular dynamics simulations by explicitly accounting for atomic polarizability. Previous work has shown promising results in simulating duplex nucleic acids and protein structures with excellent agreement with experimental values. However, benchmarking the Drude polarizable force field with highly flexible, single-stranded structures has yet to be achieved. In this work, the r(GACC) tetranucleotide is simulated over a multimicrosecond time scale, starting with various different initial conformations. Despite the starting conformation, including starting from the expected dominant A-form major conformation, the experimental structural distribution is not matched. In fact, the major NMR conformation is never resampled. Instead, the r(GACC) tetranucleotide becomes stabilized in anomalous structures that are inconsistent with the NMR data and that favor base-pairing and electrostatic interactions over base stacking. These structures are maintained for lengthy time scales (>1 μs) themselves, suggesting a misbalance of forces in the Drude polarizable force field itself. This model system is suggestive of the fact that currently the Drude polarizable force field does not appear to produce the sensitive balance of forces required to accurately model other single-stranded or noncanonical RNA structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.