Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36996093›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Dear Pandemic: A topic modeling analysis of COVID-19 information needs among readers of an online science communication campaign.

Aleksandra M Golos, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Lindsey J Leininger, Amanda M Simanek, Aparna Kumar, Sandra S Albrecht, Jennifer Beam Dowd, Malia Jones, Alison M Buttenheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aleksandra M GolosDepartment of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5803-4164
Sharath Chandra GuntukuDepartment of Computer and Information Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Rachael Piltch-LoebDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Lindsey J LeiningerTuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States of America.
Amanda M SimanekJoseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.
Aparna KumarCollege of Nursing, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Sandra S AlbrechtDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3444-2192
Jennifer Beam DowdLeverhulme Centre for Demographic Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Malia JonesApplied Population Laboratory, Department of Community and Environmental Sociology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Alison M ButtenheimDepartment of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.

Funding

Investigating and identifying the heterogeneity in COVID-19 misinformation exposure on social media among Black and Rural communities to inform precision public health messagingR01MD018340 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUNTUKU, SHARATH CHANDRA · 2022 to 2024
$2.4M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD018340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic was accompanied by an "infodemic"-an overwhelming excess of accurate, inaccurate, and uncertain information. The social media-based science communication campaign Dear Pandemic was established to address the COVID-19 infodemic, in part by soliciting submissions from readers to an online question box. Our study characterized the information needs of Dear Pandemic's readers by identifying themes and longitudinal trends among question box submissions.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of questions submitted from August 24, 2020, to August 24, 2021. We used Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modeling to identify 25 topics among the submissions, then used thematic analysis to interpret the topics based on their top words and submissions. We used t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding to visualize the relationship between topics, and we used generalized additive models to describe trends in topic prevalence over time.

resultsWe analyzed 3839 submissions, 90% from United States-based readers. We classified the 25 topics into 6 overarching themes: 'Scientific and Medical Basis of COVID-19,' 'COVID-19 Vaccine,' 'COVID-19 Mitigation Strategies,' 'Society and Institutions,' 'Family and Personal Relationships,' and 'Navigating the COVID-19 Infodemic.' Trends in topics about viral variants, vaccination, COVID-19 mitigation strategies, and children aligned with the news cycle and reflected the anticipation of future events. Over time, vaccine-related submissions became increasingly related to those surrounding social interaction.

conclusionsQuestion box submissions represented distinct themes that varied in prominence over time. Dear Pandemic's readers sought information that would not only clarify novel scientific concepts, but would also be timely and practical to their personal lives. Our question box format and topic modeling approach offers science communicators a robust methodology for tracking, understanding, and responding to the information needs of online audiences.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaChildCommunicationCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36996093
PMCPMC10062627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.