ArticlePloS one2023
Identification of cancer-related genes FGFR2 and CEBPB in choledochal cyst via RNA sequencing of patient-derived liver organoids.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phytochemical profiling and anticancer potential of pistachio wastes against MCF-7 breast cancer cells: a metabolic and apoptotic pathway analysis.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Applications of 3D models in cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Introducing the PLOS collection on rare cancer.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCholedochal cysts (CC) are congenital bile duct anomalies with 6-30% risk for developing bile duct cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer risk of CC are unknown. We sought to identify the gene expression changes underlying the cancer risk of CC patients.
methodsLiver organoids (n = 51) were generated from liver/bile duct biopsies of CC (n = 7; type I) and hepatoblastoma (n = 5; HB: non-tumor & tumor) for RNA sequencing. Bioinformatics analysis was conducted to identify differentially expressed cancer-related genes in CC and controls. We compared CC with non-cancerous and cancerous controls, normal adjacent non-tumor region of hepatoblastoma (HB) liver as non-cancerous control and tumor region as non-CC cancer control (HB-tumor). Reverse transcription real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) verification and immunohistochemistry of selected genes was conducted in additional CC and HB liver biopsies.
findingsHB non-tumor and HB tumor organoids displayed distinct gene expression profiles. Expression profiling separated CC organoids into two clusters, one overlapping with HB non-tumor and the other one with HB tumor organoids. Genes selected based on their log2FoldChange values for RT-qPCR verification in 31 CC and 11 HB non-tumor liver tissues revealed significantly elevated expression of FGFR2 in 7 and CEBPB in 2 CC liver tissues (CC vs HB: 4.082 vs. 0.7671, p<0.01; 2.506 vs. 1.210, p<0.01). Distinctive positive staining in bile ducts were seen in CC, HB tumor and non-tumor liver tissues for FGFR2 and CEBPB. Percentages of CEBPB-immuno-positive or FGFR2-immuno-positive bile duct cells in CC and HB-tumor liver were higher than that in HB non-tumor liver.
interpretationThe study identified dysregulated genes related to cancer pathways in CC patients suggesting cancer risk. The findings suggest that the elevated expression of FGFR2 and CEBPB in liver may contribute to cancer development in CC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.