Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36996060›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Generalized statistics: Applications to data inverse problems with outlier-resistance.

Gustavo Z Dos Santos Lima, João V T de Lima, João M de Araújo, Gilberto Corso, Sérgio Luiz E F da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Relativistic Roots ofEntropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gustavo Z Dos Santos LimaSchool of Science and Technology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4462-0522
João V T de LimaDepartment of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
João M de AraújoDepartment of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Gilberto CorsoDepartment of Biophysics and Pharmacology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Sérgio Luiz E F da SilvaDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, TO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6384-5049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conventional approach to data-driven inversion framework is based on Gaussian statistics that presents serious difficulties, especially in the presence of outliers in the measurements. In this work, we present maximum likelihood estimators associated with generalized Gaussian distributions in the context of Rényi, Tsallis and Kaniadakis statistics. In this regard, we analytically analyze the outlier-resistance of each proposal through the so-called influence function. In this way, we formulate inverse problems by constructing objective functions linked to the maximum likelihood estimators. To demonstrate the robustness of the generalized methodologies, we consider an important geophysical inverse problem with high noisy data with spikes. The results reveal that the best data inversion performance occurs when the entropic index from each generalized statistic is associated with objective functions proportional to the inverse of the error amplitude. We argue that in such a limit the three approaches are resistant to outliers and are also equivalent, which suggests a lower computational cost for the inversion process due to the reduction of numerical simulations to be performed and the fast convergence of the optimization process.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsLikelihood FunctionsNormal Distribution

Identifiers

PMID36996060
PMCPMC10062568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.