Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36996036›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Behaviour change interventions improve maternal and child nutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.

Daniella Watson, Patience Mushamiri, Paula Beeri, Toussaint Rouamba, Sarah Jenner, Simone Proebstl, Sarah H Kehoe, Kate A Ward, Mary Barker, Wendy Lawrence and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Daniella WatsonGlobal Health Research Institute, Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6353-7495
Patience MushamiriSAMRC Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science, PRICELESS, University of the Witwatersrand, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Paula BeeriNavrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Toussaint RouambaClinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institute for Research in Health Sciences, National Center for Scientific and Technological Research, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0594-3887
Sarah JennerMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Simone ProebstlMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0599-2486
Sarah H KehoeGlobal Health Research Institute, Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Kate A WardGlobal Health Research Institute, Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Mary BarkerMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Wendy LawrenceMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
INPreP Study Group
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · GBSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique · BFNavrongo Health Research Centre · GHNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBZimmer Biomet (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_MR/R018545/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence that nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions can improve maternal and child nutrition status in sub-Saharan Africa is inconclusive. Using behaviour change theory and techniques in intervention design may increase effectiveness and make outcomes more predictable. This systematic review aimed to determine whether interventions that included behaviour change functions were effective. Six databases were searched systematically, using MeSH and free-text terms, for articles describing nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive behaviour change interventions published in English until January 2022. Titles, abstracts and full-text papers were double-screened. Data extraction and quality assessments followed Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines. Behaviour change functions of interventions were mapped onto the COM-B model and Behaviour Change Wheel. PROSPERO registered (135054). The search yielded 1193 articles: 79 articles met inclusion criteria, ranging from low (n = 30) to high (n = 11) risk of bias. Many that applied behaviour change theory, communication or counselling resulted in significant improvements in infant stunting and wasting, household dietary intake and maternal psychosocial measures. Interventions with >2 behaviour change functions (including persuasion, incentivisation, environmental restructuring) were the most effective. We recommend incorporating behaviour change functions in nutrition interventions to improve maternal and child outcomes, specifically drawing on the Behaviour Change Wheel, COM-B model (SORT B recommendation). To enhance the designs of these interventions, and ultimately improve the nutritional and psychosocial outcomes for mothers and infants in sub-Saharan Africa, collaborations are recommended between behaviour change and nutrition experts, intervention designers, policy makers and commissioners to fund and roll-out multicomponent behaviour change interventions.

Identifiers

PMID36996036
PMCPMC10062616
OpenAlexW4361268512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.