ArticlePloS one2023
Effects of co-occurrence and intra- and interspecific interactions between Drosophila suzukii and Zaprionus indianus.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A roadmap to key traits of invasive Drosophilidae.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Article
- Host plant nutrition drives fitness outcomes in the cactus specialist Drosophila mettleri.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Strength of Enemy Release From Parasitoids Is Context Dependent in the Invasive African Fig Fly,Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Strength of enemy release from parasitoids is context-dependent in the invasive African Fig Fly,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In drosophilids, competition and coexistence can impact survivorship, growth, and reproductive output. Here, we evaluated direct competition between two co-occurring fruit flies, the spotted-wing drosophila Drosophila suzukii and the African fig fly Zaprionus indianus, comparing results from field collections with laboratory experiments. Field collections were conducted to evaluate co-occurrence between species. In the laboratory, different densities of eggs of each species were provided an artificial diet, and intra- and interspecific densities were evaluated regarding biological traits such as development and fecundity. Field collections showed a prevalence of Z. indianus, followed by other drosophilid species, including D. suzukii. Pupal survival and adult emergence were higher in D. suzukii than in Z. indianus at both intra- and interspecific densities, with decreasing values in response to increased densities. Fecundity did not differ significantly for either species at different intraspecific densities, but when reared together at different densities, Z. indianus was significantly more fecund than D. suzukii. Development time showed no significant difference at intraspecific densities, but when reared together, Z. indianus had longer development times than D. suzukii. Leslie Matrix projections indicated that D. suzukii showed practically the same dynamics at intraspecific and interspecific densities, with increasing oscillations at low and intermediate densities and decreasing oscillations at high densities. Zaprionus indianus showed a similar oscillation to D. suzukii, except at intermediate intraspecific densities, when the pattern was cyclic. Low interspecific densities resulted in decreasing oscillations. In the two-choice oviposition bioassays, D. suzukii females showed no significant preference for diets previously infested or not with either conspecific or heterospecific eggs at different densities. Understanding competitive interactions between co-occurring heterospecific species should be considered when establishing management tactics for spotted-wing drosophila.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.