Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995795›Full record

ReviewThe journal of physical chemistry. B2023

Connecting Diffraction Experiments and Network Analysis Tools for the Study of Hydrogen-Bonded Networks.

Imre Bakó, Szilvia Pothoczki, László Pusztai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Imre BakóResearch Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest H-1121, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-6302-5999
Szilvia PothoczkiWigner Research Centre for Physics, Konkoly Thege út 29-33, Budapest H-1121, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4884-1813
László PusztaiWigner Research Centre for Physics, Konkoly Thege út 29-33, Budapest H-1121, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A self-consistent scheme is presented that is applicable for revealing details of the microscopic structure of hydrogen-bonded liquids, including the description of the hydrogen-bonded network. The scheme starts with diffraction measurements, followed by molecular dynamics simulations. Computational results are compared with the experimentally accessible information on the structure, which is most frequently the total scattering structure factor. In the case of an at least semiquantitative agreement between experiment and simulation, sets of particle coordinates from the latter may be exploited for revealing nonmeasurable structural details. Calculations of some properties concerning the hydrogen-bonded network are also described, in the order of increasing complexity: starting with the definition of a hydrogen bond, first and second neighborhoods are described via spatial correlations functions. Attention is then turned to cyclic and noncyclic hydrogen-bonded clusters, before cluster size distributions and percolation are discussed. We would like to point out that, as a result of applying the novel protocol, these latter, rather abstract, quantities become consistent with diffraction data: it may thus be argued that the approach reviewed here is the first one that establishes a direct link between measurements and elements of network theories. Applications for liquid water, simple alcohols, and alcohol-water liquid mixtures demonstrate the usefulness of the aforementioned characteristics. The procedure can readily be applied to more complicated hydrogen-bonded networks, like mixtures of polyols (diols, triols, sugars, etc.) and water, and complex aqueous solutions of even larger molecules (even of proteins).

Identifiers

PMID36995795
PMCPMC10108367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.