ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023
Federated Machine Learning, Privacy-Enhancing Technologies, and Data Protection Laws in Medical Research: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Neuromuscular Diseases: Opportunities for a Data-Scarce Field.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning in Radiology Reports: Comparative Evaluation of Tokenizer and Batch-Size Privacy Risks.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Clifti-GPT: privacy-preserving federated fine-tuning and transferable inference of foundation models on clinical single-cell data.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Eleven quick tips for Biomedical Federated Learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Federating European REgistries for Stroke: Principles, Data Model and Future Perspectives for a Federated Analysis of Multiple Prospective Stroke Registries.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Legislation Literacy, Governance Readiness, and Adoption Intentions in Romanian Healthcare: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Rare Diseases: Workflow-Integrated Precision Kidney Care.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Federated multimodal learning for privacy-preserving blood donor profiling and personalized recall strategy optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Why Should a Genome Be Protected? Ethical, Legal, and Security Challenges in the Protection of Genomic Data.Biology · 2026Review
- Data reuse in global health: perspectives from actors in policy, funding and research.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Intelligent Decision Support for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Machine Learning Spans From Anatomical Assessment to Dynamic Risk Modeling.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Comparing decentralized machine learning and AI clinical models to local and centralized alternatives: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Privacy-preserving federated prediction of health outcomes using multi-center survey data.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Federated Learning in Healthcare Ethics: A Systematic Review of Privacy-Preserving and Equitable Medical AI.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development and validation of random-forest based federated ensemble learning algorithms for delirium prediction using electronic medical records from eleven hospitals in Austria: a retrospective study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Computational approaches to multimodal data integration in rheumatoid arthritis: from data landscape to clinical translation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Privacy-by-Design with Federated Learning will drive future Rare Disease Research.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Federated Learning for Histopathology Image Classification: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- FedMedSecure: federated few-shot learning with cross-attention mechanisms and explainable AI for collaborative healthcare cybersecurity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe collection, storage, and analysis of large data sets are relevant in many sectors. Especially in the medical field, the processing of patient data promises great progress in personalized health care. However, it is strictly regulated, such as by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). These regulations mandate strict data security and data protection and, thus, create major challenges for collecting and using large data sets. Technologies such as federated learning (FL), especially paired with differential privacy (DP) and secure multiparty computation (SMPC), aim to solve these challenges.
objectiveThis scoping review aimed to summarize the current discussion on the legal questions and concerns related to FL systems in medical research. We were particularly interested in whether and to what extent FL applications and training processes are compliant with the GDPR data protection law and whether the use of the aforementioned privacy-enhancing technologies (DP and SMPC) affects this legal compliance. We placed special emphasis on the consequences for medical research and development.
methodsWe performed a scoping review according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). We reviewed articles on Beck-Online, SSRN, ScienceDirect, arXiv, and Google Scholar published in German or English between 2016 and 2022. We examined 4 questions: whether local and global models are "personal data" as per the GDPR; what the "roles" as defined by the GDPR of various parties in FL are; who controls the data at various stages of the training process; and how, if at all, the use of privacy-enhancing technologies affects these findings.
resultsWe identified and summarized the findings of 56 relevant publications on FL. Local and likely also global models constitute personal data according to the GDPR. FL strengthens data protection but is still vulnerable to a number of attacks and the possibility of data leakage. These concerns can be successfully addressed through the privacy-enhancing technologies SMPC and DP.
conclusionsCombining FL with SMPC and DP is necessary to fulfill the legal data protection requirements (GDPR) in medical research dealing with personal data. Even though some technical and legal challenges remain, for example, the possibility of successful attacks on the system, combining FL with SMPC and DP creates enough security to satisfy the legal requirements of the GDPR. This combination thereby provides an attractive technical solution for health institutions willing to collaborate without exposing their data to risk. From a legal perspective, the combination provides enough built-in security measures to satisfy data protection requirements, and from a technical perspective, the combination provides secure systems with comparable performance with centralized machine learning applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.