Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995757›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

mHealth Systems Need a Privacy-by-Design Approach: Commentary on "Federated Machine Learning, Privacy-Enhancing Technologies, and Data Protection Laws in Medical Research: Scoping Review".

Ambuj Tewari

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ambuj TewariDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6969-7844

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brauneck and colleagues have combined technical and legal perspectives in their timely and valuable paper "Federated Machine Learning, Privacy-Enhancing Technologies, and Data Protection Laws in Medical Research: Scoping Review." Researchers who design mobile health (mHealth) systems must adopt the same privacy-by-design approach that privacy regulations (eg, General Data Protection Regulation) do. In order to do this successfully, we will have to overcome implementation challenges in privacy-enhancing technologies such as differential privacy. We will also have to pay close attention to emerging technologies such as private synthetic data generation.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchTelemedicineComputer SecurityHumansMachine LearningPrivacyScoping Reviews as Topicdata protection by designdata protection regulationdifferential privacyfederated learningGDPR complianceGeneral Data Protection Regulationmachine learningmHealthmultiparty computationprivacyprivacy-preserving technologiesprivacy protectionprivate synthetic datasecure multiparty computation

Identifiers

PMID36995757
PMCPMC10131640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.