Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995743›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2023

Experiences of Using an Electronic Health Tool Among Health Care Professionals Involved in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management: Qualitative Analysis.

André Nyberg, Anna Sondell, Sara Lundell, Sarah Marklund, Malin Tistad, Karin Wadell

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02696187 (Feasibility and Effects of KOL-webben - an Internet Based Health Promotion Tool Directed Towards People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Staff in the Primary Health Care in Sweden), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02696187 nacompletednot on this map

Feasibility and Effects of KOL-webben - an Internet Based Health Promotion Tool Directed Towards People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Staff in the Primary Health Care in Sweden

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2016 to 2018Enrolled83ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsKOLwebben
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

André NybergDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Section of Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-7959
Anna SondellDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Section of Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-4661
Sara LundellDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Section of Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9688-8101
Sarah MarklundDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Section of Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-8518
Malin TistadSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0581-2895
Karin WadellDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Section of Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7334-8698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common and deadliest chronic diseases of the 21st century. eHealth tools are seen as a promising way of supporting health care professionals in providing evidence-based COPD care, for example, by reinforcing information and interventions provided to the patients and providing easier access and support to the health care professional themselves. Still, knowledge is scarce on the experience of using eHealth tools from the perspective of the health care professional involved in COPD management.

objectiveThe study explored the experiences of using an eHealth tool among health care professionals that worked with patients with COPD in their daily clinical practice.

methodsThis exploratory qualitative study is part of a process evaluation in a parallel group, controlled, pragmatic pilot trial. Semistructured interviews were performed with 10 health care professionals 3 and 12 months after getting access to an eHealth tool, the COPD Web. The COPD Web, developed using cocreation, is an interactive web-based platform that aims to help health care professionals provide health-promoting strategies. Data from the interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach.

resultsThe main results reflected health care professionals' experiences in 3 categories: receiving competence support and adjusting practice, improving quality of care, and efforts required for implementation. These categories highlighted that using an eHealth tool such as the COPD Web was experienced to provide knowledge support for health care professionals that led to adaptation and facilitation of working procedures and person-centered care. Taken together, these changes were perceived to improve the quality of care through enhanced patient contact and encouragement of interprofessional collaboration. In addition, health care professionals expressed that patients using the COPD Web were better equipped to tackle their disease and adhered better to provided treatment, increasing their self-management ability. However, structural and external barriers bar the successful implementation of an eHealth tool in daily praxis.

conclusionsThis study is among the first to explore experiences of using an eHealth tool among health care professionals involved in COPD management. Our novel findings highlight that using an eHealth tool such as the COPD Web may improve the quality of care for patients with COPD (eg, by providing knowledge support for health care professionals and adapting and facilitating working procedures). Our results also indicate that an eHealth tool fosters collaborative interactions between patients and health care professionals, which explains why eHealth is a valuable means of encouraging well-informed and autonomous patients. However, structural and external barriers requiring time, support, and education must be addressed to ensure that an eHealth tool can be successfully implemented in daily praxis.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02696187; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02696187.

Indexed as

carechronicclinicalCOPDeHealthelectronichealth care professionalsimplementationinternetmanagementprimary carepulmonarysupporttoolsweb based

Identifiers

PMID36995743
PMCPMC10131608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.