Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995724›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of orthodontics2023

Effect of treatment with dental space maintainers after the early extraction of the second primary molar: a systematic review.

Tuka Tabatabai, Heidrun Kjellberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of orthodontics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tuka TabatabaiSmile Tandvård, Landskrona, Skåne,Sweden.
Heidrun KjellbergSpecialist Clinic of Orthodontics, Public Dental Service, Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
Public Dental Service Västra Götaland · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly loss of second primary molars may lead to different malocclusions, mainly caused by the mesial migration of the first permanent molar. To prevent space loss in the dental arch, different types of space maintainers (SM) are used.

objectivesThe main objective of this systematic review is to examine the evidence in the literature regarding the effect of SM, including the clinical effect, risk of developing caries and periodontal disease, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness after the premature loss of the second primary molar in children. SEARCH

methodsThe present systematic review was made according to PRISMA. The literature search was performed using four databases (last search 30/8/2022): PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Web of Science. SELECTION CRITERIA: The studies included were randomized controlled trials, economic evaluations, and non-randomized clinical studies with a defined control group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data collected by the two authors were in regard to reports, studies, participants, research designs, and interventions. The assessment of the risk of bias was made using the ROBINSON-I tool.

resultsThe search yielded 1058 articles after the removal of duplicates. Two studies were included in the final review with a moderate risk of bias, and measured space changes in the dental arch and the periodontal status of patients treated with SM. The main results indicate that treatment with SM can preserve arch length, but also cause an increase in plaque accumulation and other periodontal parameters. However, there is an overall lack of scientific evidence regarding the effect of the treatment. LIMITATIONS: No studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were found on cost-effectiveness, risk of caries development, and patient satisfaction.

conclusionsThe scientific evidence is lacking regarding the clinical effect, cost effect, and side-effects such as caries and periodontal disease when using SM in children with a premature loss of the second primary molar. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration (CRD 42021290130).

Indexed as

Dental CariesMolarBiasChildCost-Benefit AnalysisDental CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID36995724
PMCPMC10389058
OpenAlexW4361232860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.