SynthesisEuropean journal of orthodontics2023
Effect of treatment with dental space maintainers after the early extraction of the second primary molar: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of orthodontics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital Manufacturing and Periodontal Performance of CAD/CAM-Customized Orthodontic Molar Bands Compared with Standard Stainless-Steel Bands.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Global Research Trends in Pediatric Space Maintainers: A Bibliometric Analysis of Web of Science Literature.Cureus · 2026Article
- Complications of lower arch space maintainers in pediatric patients: a retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Endodontic Retreatment Using Rotary System and Aesthetic Rehabilitation of a Deciduous Central Maxillary Incisor in a 5-Year-Old Child: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Transforming Dental Care, Practice and Education with Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing: Innovations in Materials, Technologies, and Future Pathways.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Mandibular Second Premolar Impaction: A Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly loss of second primary molars may lead to different malocclusions, mainly caused by the mesial migration of the first permanent molar. To prevent space loss in the dental arch, different types of space maintainers (SM) are used.
objectivesThe main objective of this systematic review is to examine the evidence in the literature regarding the effect of SM, including the clinical effect, risk of developing caries and periodontal disease, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness after the premature loss of the second primary molar in children. SEARCH
methodsThe present systematic review was made according to PRISMA. The literature search was performed using four databases (last search 30/8/2022): PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Web of Science. SELECTION CRITERIA: The studies included were randomized controlled trials, economic evaluations, and non-randomized clinical studies with a defined control group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data collected by the two authors were in regard to reports, studies, participants, research designs, and interventions. The assessment of the risk of bias was made using the ROBINSON-I tool.
resultsThe search yielded 1058 articles after the removal of duplicates. Two studies were included in the final review with a moderate risk of bias, and measured space changes in the dental arch and the periodontal status of patients treated with SM. The main results indicate that treatment with SM can preserve arch length, but also cause an increase in plaque accumulation and other periodontal parameters. However, there is an overall lack of scientific evidence regarding the effect of the treatment. LIMITATIONS: No studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were found on cost-effectiveness, risk of caries development, and patient satisfaction.
conclusionsThe scientific evidence is lacking regarding the clinical effect, cost effect, and side-effects such as caries and periodontal disease when using SM in children with a premature loss of the second primary molar. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration (CRD 42021290130).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.