Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995714›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Association of Demographic and Socioeconomic Indicators With the Use of Wearable Devices Among Children.

Ethan H Kim, Jessica L Jenness, Adam Bryant Miller, Ramzi Halabi, Massimiliano de Zambotti, Kara S Bagot, Fiona C Baker, Abhishek Pratap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors Associated with Fitbit Ownership in the NIHInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ethan H KimKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jessica L JennessDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Adam Bryant MillerRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Ramzi HalabiKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Massimiliano de ZambottiCenter for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, California.
Kara S BagotAddiction Institute, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Fiona C BakerCenter for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, California.
Abhishek PratapKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Testing the predictive power of neural connectivity: Suicidal ideation in youth exposed to maltreatmentK01MH116325 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MILLER, ADAM BRYANT · 2018 to 2022
$898k
Targeted Intervention for Adolescents following Child Maltreatment: Examining Neural and Behavioral Mechanisms within the Positive Valence SystemK23MH112872 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JENNESS, JESSICA LYNNE · 2017 to 2021
$806k
Evaluation of an Asynchronous Remote Communities Approach to Behavioral Activation for Depressed AdolescentsR34MH128387 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JENNESS, JESSICA LYNNE, KIENTZ, JULIE · 2022 to 2024
$726k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH116325NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH112872NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH128387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The use of consumer-grade wearable devices for collecting data for biomedical research may be associated with social determinants of health (SDoHs) linked to people's understanding of and willingness to join and remain engaged in remote health studies. Objective: To examine whether demographic and socioeconomic indicators are associated with willingness to join a wearable device study and adherence to wearable data collection in children. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used wearable device usage data collected from 10 414 participants (aged 11-13 years) at the year-2 follow-up (2018-2020) of the ongoing Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, performed at 21 sites across the United States. Data were analyzed from November 2021 to July 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 2 primary outcomes were (1) participant retention in the wearable device substudy and (2) total device wear time during the 21-day observation period. Associations between the primary end points and sociodemographic and economic indicators were examined. Results: The mean (SD) age of the 10 414 participants was 12.00 (0.72) years, with 5444 (52.3%) male participants. Overall, 1424 participants (13.7%) were Black; 2048 (19.7%), Hispanic; and 5615 (53.9%) White. Substantial differences were observed between the cohort that participated and shared wearable device data (wearable device cohort [WDC]; 7424 participants [71.3%]) compared with those who did not participate or share data (no wearable device cohort [NWDC]; 2900 participants [28.7%]). Black children were significantly underrepresented (-59%) in the WDC (847 [11.4%]) compared with the NWDC (577 [19.3%]; P < .001). In contrast, White children were overrepresented (+132%) in the WDC (4301 [57.9%]) vs the NWDC (1314 [43.9%]; P < .001). Children from low-income households (<$24 999) were significantly underrepresented in WDC (638 [8.6%]) compared with NWDC (492 [16.5%]; P < .001). Overall, Black children were retained for a substantially shorter duration (16 days; 95% CI, 14-17 days) compared with White children (21 days; 95% CI, 21-21 days; P < .001) in the wearable device substudy. In addition, total device wear time during the observation was notably different between Black vs White children (β = -43.00 hours; 95% CI, -55.11 to -30.88 hours; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, large-scale wearable device data collected from children showed considerable differences between White and Black children in terms of enrollment and daily wear time. While wearable devices provide an opportunity for real-time, high-frequency contextual monitoring of individuals' health, future studies should account for and address considerable representational bias in wearable data collection associated with demographic and SDoH factors.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesAdolescentChildCohort StudiesDemographyFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36995714
PMCPMC10064258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.