Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995713›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Transmission Characteristics and Inactivated Vaccine Effectiveness Against Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 Variants in Urumqi, China.

Kai Wang, Zihao Guo, Ting Zeng, Shengzhi Sun, Yanmei Lu, Jun Wang, Shulin Li, Zemin Luan, Huling Li, Jing Zhang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kai WangState Key Laboratory of Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Treatment of High Incidence Diseases in Central Asia, Department of Medical Engineering and Technology, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Zihao GuoJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ting ZengState Key Laboratory of Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Treatment of High Incidence Diseases in Central Asia, Department of Medical Engineering and Technology, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Shengzhi SunDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yanmei LuDepartment of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Jun WangUrumqi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Urumqi, China.
Shulin LiUrumqi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Urumqi, China.
Zemin LuanSchool of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Huling LiSchool of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Jing ZhangSchool of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Yida WangSchool of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Yaoqin LuSchool of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Shi ZhaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In 2022, Omicron variants circulated globally, and Urumqi, China, experienced a COVID-19 outbreak seeded by Omicron BA.5 variants, resulting in the highest number of infections in the city's record before the exit of the zero COVID-19 strategy. Little was known about the characteristics of Omicron variants in mainland China. Objective: To evaluate transmission characteristics of Omicron BA.5 variants and the effectiveness of inactivated vaccine (mainly BBIBP-CorV) against their transmission. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted using data from an Omicron-seeded COVID-19 outbreak in Urumqi from August 7 to September 7, 2022. Participants included all individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and their close contacts identified between August 7 and September 7, 2022 in Urumqi. Exposures: A booster dose was compared vs 2 doses (reference level) of inactivated vaccine and risk factors were evaluated. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic characteristics, timeline records from exposure to laboratory testing outcomes, contact tracing history, and contact setting were obtained. The mean and variance of the key time-to-event intervals of transmission were estimated for individuals with known information. Transmission risks and contact patterns were assessed under different disease-control measures and in different contact settings. The effectiveness of inactivated vaccine against the transmission of Omicron BA.5 was estimated using multivariate logistic regression models. Results: Among 1139 individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 (630 females [55.3%]; mean [SD] age, 37.4 [19.9] years) and 51 323 close contacts who tested negative for COVID-19 (26 299 females [51.2%]; mean [SD] age, 38.4 [16.0] years), the means of generation interval, viral shedding period, and incubation period were estimated at 2.8 days (95% credible interval [CrI], 2.4-3.5 days), 6.7 days (95% CrI, 6.4-7.1 days), and 5.7 days (95% CrI, 4.8-6.6 days), respectively. Despite contact tracing, intensive control measures, and high vaccine coverage (980 individuals with infections [86.0%] received ≥2 doses of vaccine), high transmission risks were found in household settings (secondary attack rate, 14.7%; 95% CrI, 13.0%-16.5%) and younger (aged 0-15 years; secondary attack rate, 2.5%; 95% CrI, 1.9%-3.1%) and older age (aged >65 years; secondary attack rate, 2.2%; 95% CrI, 1.5%-3.0%) groups. Vaccine effectiveness against BA.5 variant transmission for the booster-dose vs 2 doses was 28.9% (95% CrI, 7.7%-45.2%) and 48.5% (95% CrI, 23.9%-61.4%) for 15-90 days after booster dose. No protective outcome was detected beyond 90 days after the booster dose. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study revealed key transmission characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 as they evolved, as well as vaccine effectiveness against variants. These findings suggest the importance of continuously evaluating vaccine effectiveness against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultChinaCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansVaccine EfficacyVaccines, InactivatedBIBP COVID-19 vaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID36995713
PMCPMC10064257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.