Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995680›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Genome Editing in Pigs.

David Preisinger, Thomas Winogrodzki, Bernhard Klinger, Angelika Schnieke, Beate Rieblinger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Perspectives in Genome-Editing Techniques for Livestock.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David Preisinger *Department of Animal Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, Freising, Germany.
Thomas Winogrodzki *Department of Animal Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, Freising, Germany.
Bernhard KlingerDepartment of Animal Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, Freising, Germany.
Angelika Schnieke *Department of Animal Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, Freising, Germany.
Beate Rieblinger *Department of Animal Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, Freising, Germany. beate.rieblinger@tum.de.
Technical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of genetically engineered (GE) pigs for disease modeling and xenotransplantation has been massively facilitated by the discovery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. For livestock, genome editing is a powerful tool when used in combination with either somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) or microinjection (MI) into fertilized oocytes. To generate either knockout or knock-in animals using SCNT, genome editing is carried out in vitro. This has the advantage that fully characterized cells are being employed to generate cloned pigs, predetermining their genetic makeups. However, this technique is labor-intensive and, hence, SCNT is better suited for more challenging projects such as the generation of multi-knockout- and knock-in pigs. Alternatively, CRISPR/Cas9 is introduced directly into fertilized zygotes via microinjection to produce knockout pigs more rapidly. Finally, the embryos are each transferred into recipient sows to deliver GE piglets.Both techniques, SCNT and MI, are technically challenging and therefore require skilled expertise, especially when applied for porcine embryos. Here, we present a detailed laboratory protocol for the generation of knockout and knock-in porcine somatic donor cells for SCNT and knockout pigs via microinjection. We describe the state-of-the-art method for isolation, cultivation, and manipulation of porcine somatic cells, which can then be used for SCNT. Moreover, we describe the isolation and maturation of porcine oocytes, their manipulation by microinjection, and the embryo transfer into surrogate sows.

Indexed as

Gene EditingGenetic EngineeringAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Cas SystemsFemaleNuclear Transfer TechniquesOocytesSwineZygoteCRISPR/Cas9Embryo transferGenome editingKnock-inKnockoutMicroinjectionPigPorcine somatic cellsSomatic cell nuclear transferZygote

Identifiers

PMID36995680
OpenAlexW4361301398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.