ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Genetic and Molecular Quality Control of Genetically Engineered Mice.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Mortem Detection and Visualization of Mimivirus Reactivation in Fatal Viral Pneumonia.Viruses · 2026Article
- Unbiased Long-Read Whole-Genome Sequencing Enables High-Resolution Mapping of Transgene Concatenation and Off-target Genomic Disruption in a Mouse Model.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Engineering Base Changes and Epitope-Tagged Alleles in Mice Using Cas9 RNA-Guided Nuclease.Current protocols · 2025Article
- Long read sequencing reveals transgene concatemerization and vector sequences integration following AAV-driven electroporation of CRISPR RNP complexes in mouse zygotes.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Article
- Improving laboratory animal genetic reporting: LAG-R guidelines.Nature communications · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetically engineered mice are used as avatars to understand mammalian gene function and develop therapies for human disease. During genetic modification, unintended changes can occur, and these changes may result in misassigned gene-phenotype relationships leading to incorrect or incomplete experimental interpretations. The types of unintended changes that may occur depend on the allele type being made and the genetic engineering approach used. Here we broadly categorize allele types as deletions, insertions, base changes, and transgenes derived from engineered embryonic stem (ES) cells or edited mouse embryos. However, the methods we describe can be adapted to other allele types and engineering strategies. We describe the sources and consequ ences of common unintended changes and best practices for detecting both intended and unintended changes by screening and genetic and molecular quality control (QC) of chimeras, founders, and their progeny. Employing these practices, along with careful allele design and good colony management, will increase the chance that investigations using genetically engineered mice will produce high-quality reproducible results, to enable a robust understanding of gene function, human disease etiology, and therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36995664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.