Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995624›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Automated, High-Throughput Protoplast Transfection for Gene Editing and Transgene Expression Studies.

Stephen B Rigoulot, Brenden Barco, Yingxiao Zhang, Chengjin Zhang, Kerry A Meier, Matthew Moore, Jonathan Fabish, Rachel Whinna, Jeongmoo Park, Erin M Seaberry and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development of high-throughput tissue culture-free plant transformation systems.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen B RigoulotSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. stephen.rigoulot@syngenta.com.
Brenden BarcoSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Yingxiao ZhangSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Chengjin ZhangSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Kerry A MeierSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Matthew MooreSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Jonathan FabishSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Rachel WhinnaSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Jeongmoo ParkSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Erin M SeaberrySyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Aditya GopalanSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Shujie DongSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Zhongying ChenSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Qiudeng QueSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. qiudeng.que@syngenta.com.
Syngenta (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an era of cost-efficient gene synthesis and high-throughput construct assembly, the onus of scientific experimentation is on the rate of in vivo testing for the identification of top performing candidates or designs. Assay platforms that are relevant to the species of interest and in the tissue of choice are highly desirable. A protoplast isolation and transfection method that is compatible with a large repertoire of species and tissues would be the platform of choice. A necessary aspect of this high-throughput screening approach is the need to handle many delicate protoplast samples at the same time, which is a bottleneck for manual operation. Such bottlenecks can be mitigated with the use of automated liquid handlers for the execution of protoplast transfection steps. The method described within this chapter utilizes a 96-well head for simultaneous, high-throughput initiation of transfection. While initially developed and optimized for use with etiolated maize leaf protoplasts, the automated protocol has also been demonstrated to be compatible with other established protoplast systems, such as soybean immature embryo derived protoplast, similarly described within. This chapter also includes instructions for a sample randomization design to reduce the impact of edge effects, which might be present when microplates are used for fluorescence readout following transfection. We also describe a streamlined, expedient, and cost-effective protocol for determining gene editing efficiencies using the T7E1 endonuclease cleavage assay with a publicly available image analysis tool.

Indexed as

Gene EditingProtoplastsPlant LeavesTransfectionTransgenesAutomationGenome editingLiquid handlerMaizeProtoplastsRegulatory element screeningSoybean

Identifiers

PMID36995624
OpenAlexW4361303472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.