ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Automated, High-Throughput Protoplast Transfection for Gene Editing and Transgene Expression Studies.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Designing and testing CRISPRi-based synthetic gene circuits in plants.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- A multiplex hextuple luciferase assay for advancing cellular signaling analysis in plant cells.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Enhancing lipid production in plant cells through automated high-throughput genome engineering and phenotyping.The Plant cell · 2025Article
- Development of high-throughput tissue culture-free plant transformation systems.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Development of efficient targeted insertion mediated by CRISPR-Cas12a and homology-directed repair in maize.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an era of cost-efficient gene synthesis and high-throughput construct assembly, the onus of scientific experimentation is on the rate of in vivo testing for the identification of top performing candidates or designs. Assay platforms that are relevant to the species of interest and in the tissue of choice are highly desirable. A protoplast isolation and transfection method that is compatible with a large repertoire of species and tissues would be the platform of choice. A necessary aspect of this high-throughput screening approach is the need to handle many delicate protoplast samples at the same time, which is a bottleneck for manual operation. Such bottlenecks can be mitigated with the use of automated liquid handlers for the execution of protoplast transfection steps. The method described within this chapter utilizes a 96-well head for simultaneous, high-throughput initiation of transfection. While initially developed and optimized for use with etiolated maize leaf protoplasts, the automated protocol has also been demonstrated to be compatible with other established protoplast systems, such as soybean immature embryo derived protoplast, similarly described within. This chapter also includes instructions for a sample randomization design to reduce the impact of edge effects, which might be present when microplates are used for fluorescence readout following transfection. We also describe a streamlined, expedient, and cost-effective protocol for determining gene editing efficiencies using the T7E1 endonuclease cleavage assay with a publicly available image analysis tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.