ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
In Vivo Investigation of Gene Function in Muscle Stem Cells by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- In vivo systematic detection of the outcomes of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated DNA repair in skeletal muscle stem cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Article
- Non-canonical roles of Keap1/Nrf2 in regulating quiescence and early activation in adult muscle stem cells.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Multiomics and cellular senescence profiling of aging human skeletal muscle uncovers Maraviroc as a senotherapeutic approach for sarcopenia.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Skeletal muscle stem cells modulate niche function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse through YY1-CCL5 axis.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal muscle satellite cells (SCs) are adult stem cells responsible for muscle development and injury-induced muscle regeneration. Functional elucidation of intrinsic regulatory factors governing SC activity is constrained partially by the technological limitations in editing SCs in vivo. Although the power of CRISPR/Cas9 in genome manipulation has been widely documented, its application in endogenous SCs remains largely untested. Our recent study generates a muscle-specific genome editing system leveraging the Cre-dependent Cas9 knockin mice and AAV9-mediated sgRNAs delivery, which allows gene disruption in SCs in vivo. Here, we illustrate the step-by-step procedure for achieving efficient editing using the above system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.