Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995586›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

The Satellite Cell Colony Forming Cell Assay as a Tool to Measure Self-Renewal and Differentiation Potential.

Ahmed S Shams, Michael Kyba

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Elevated mitochondrial CaStem cell reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed S ShamsDepartment of Pediatrics, Lillehei Heart Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Michael KybaDepartment of Pediatrics, Lillehei Heart Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. kyba@umn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The muscle satellite cell population is responsible for homeostatic maintenance of muscle fibers in response to muscle injury and normal wear and tear. This population is heterogeneous, and its capacity for self-renewal and differentiation can be altered either by mutation of genes that regulate these processes or with natural processes such as aging. The satellite cell colony assay is a facile way to extract information about the proliferation and differentiation potential of individual cells. Here, we provide a detailed protocol for the isolation, single cell plating, culture, and evaluation of colonies derived from single satellite cells. The variables of cell survival (cloning efficiency), proliferative potential (nuclei per colony), and differentiation propensity (ratio of nuclei within myosin heavy chain-positive cytoplasm to total nuclei) can thus be obtained.

Indexed as

Muscular DiseasesSatellite Cells, Skeletal MuscleCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalColonyDifferentiationSatellite cellsSelf-renewalSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID36995586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.