ReviewCurrent urology reports2023
Review of Active Surveillance in Underrepresented and High-Risk Populations: Feasibility and Safety.
Review in Current urology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A lifespan pooled analysis of 832 cases: characterizing the lifespan profile of clinical presentations and comorbidities in congenital pulmonary airway malformation.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to investigate the current use and effectiveness of active surveillance (AS) for clinical low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) in men considered to be "high-risk" based on the factors of race, genetics, healthcare access, and socioeconomic status. RECENT
findingsAdvances in molecular biomarkers and imaging have improved the detection, risk stratification, and treatment of PCa. Still, overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent disease remain a concern. AS is therefore the preferred option for clinical low-risk disease. Yet, because of the variability in PCa presentation based on the aforementioned environmental and genetic factors, the question remains: Is active surveillance a safe option for everyone? Provider hesitancy should not necessarily exclude high-risk men from participating in AS. Rather, clinicians should employ shared decision-making, sound clinical judgment, and stringent follow-up in order to effectively counsel AS candidates and optimize AS-related outcomes in "high-risk" individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.