Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995460›Full record

ReviewAging clinical and experimental research2023

Biomarkers for risk stratification and antibiotic stewardship in elderly patients.

Marco Falcone, Michael Bauer, Ricard Ferrer, Gaëtan Gavazzi, Juan Gonzalez Del Castillo, Alberto Pilotto, Philipp Schuetz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Marco FalconeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Michael BauerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Ricard FerrerIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, SODIR Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Gaëtan GavazziClinical Geriatrics Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Juan Gonzalez Del CastilloDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, IdISSC, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Alberto PilottoDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Philipp SchuetzInternal Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Aarau Hospital, Aarau, Switzerland. Schuetzph@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6400-4949
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FREnte Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESJena University Hospital · DEKantonsspital Aarau · CHVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOptimal treatment of infections in the elderly patients population is challenging because clinical symptoms and signs may be less specific potentially resulting in both, over- and undertreatment. Elderly patients also have a less pronounced immune response to infection, which may influence kinetics of biomarkers of infection.

methodsWithin a group of experts, we critically reviewed the current literature regarding biomarkers for risk stratification and antibiotic stewardship in elderly patients with emphasis on procalcitonin (PCT).

resultsThe expert group agreed that there is strong evidence that the elderly patient population is particularly vulnerable for infections and due to ambiguity of clinical signs and parameters in the elderly, there is considerable risk for undertreatment. At the same time, however, this group of patients is particularly vulnerable for off-target effects from antibiotic treatment and limiting the use of antibiotics is therefore important. The use of infection markers including PCT to guide individual treatment decisions has thus particular appeal in geriatric patients. For the elderly, there is evidence that PCT is a valuable biomarker for assessing the risk of septic complications and adverse outcomes, and helpful for guiding individual decisions for or against antibiotic treatment. There is need for additional educational efforts regarding the concept of "biomarker-guided antibiotic stewardship" for health care providers caring for elderly patients.

conclusionUse of biomarkers, most notably PCT, has high potential to improve the antibiotic management of elderly patients with possible infection for improving both, undertreatment and overtreatment. Within this narrative review, we aim to provide evidence-based concepts for the safe and efficient use of PCT in elderly patients.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipBacterial InfectionsAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersHumansProcalcitoninRisk AssessmentAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersProcalcitoninAntibiotic stewardshipElderlyGeriatricsInfectionProcalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID36995460
PMCPMC10060920
OpenAlexW4361275320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.