Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995458›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2023

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma originating from the appendix and colorectum: a comparative analysis of a large population-based database.

Bochao Zhao, Jingchao Wang, Haikun Ye, Xinghao Cheng, Kewei Meng, Tao Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bochao ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, No.24 Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300190, People's Republic of China. summerain2010@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2198-8674
Jingchao WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, No.24 Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300190, People's Republic of China.
Haikun YeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, No.24 Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300190, People's Republic of China.
Xinghao ChengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, No.24 Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300190, People's Republic of China.
Kewei MengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, No.24 Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300190, People's Republic of China.
Tao YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, No.24 Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300190, People's Republic of China. yangtao1center@sina.com.
Tianjin First Center Hospital · CN

Funding

Tianjin Health Science and Technology Project NO.ZC20213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs a rare gastrointestinal neoplasm, the demographic, clinicopathological, and prognostic characteristics of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its biological features, survival outcome, and prognostic factors.

methodsFrom the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological and survival data of 513 patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with MANEC of the appendix and colorectum bettween 2004 and 2015. The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of MANEC located at different anatomical locations were compared, and predictive factors for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

resultsIn terms of anatomical distribution of MANEC, the appendix (64.5%, 331/513) was more frequently involved, followed by colon (28.1%, 144/513) and rectum (7.4%, 38/513). The MANEC at different anatomical locations had a distinct clinicopathological characteristic, and colorectal MANEC was significantly associated with more aggressive biological features. The survival outcomes of appendiceal MANEC were significantly better than that of colorectal MANEC (3-year CSS rate 73.8% vs 59.4%, P = 0.010; 3-year OS 69.2% vs 48.3%, P < 0.001). In addition, hemicolectomy had a better survival benefit than appendicectomy for patients with appendiceal MANEC, regardless of lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). Tumor location, histology grade III, tumor size > 2 cm, T3-T4 stage, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were independent prognostic factors for patients with MANEC.

conclusionsTumor location had an important prognostic significance for MANEC. As an uncommon clinical entity, colorectal MANEC had more aggressive biological features and worse prognosis than its appendiceal counterpart. The standard surgical procedure and clinical management strategy for MANEC need to be established.

Indexed as

AppendixCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineColorectal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsAdenocarcinomaHumansLymphatic MetastasisPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAppendicealColorectalMixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomaSurvivalTumor location

Identifiers

PMID36995458
OpenAlexW4361272184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.