Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995443›Full record

ReviewCVIR endovascular2023

Standardizing lymphangiography and lymphatic interventions: a preclinical in vivo approach with detailed procedural steps.

Feng Pan, Thuy D Do, Niclas Schmitt, Dominik F Vollherbst, Markus Möhlenbruch, Parham Tinoush, Alexander Brobeil, Vitali Koch, Götz M Richter, Philippe L Pereira and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CVIR endovascular, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Feng PanClinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thuy D DoClinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Niclas SchmittDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dominik F VollherbstDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus MöhlenbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Parham TinoushClinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander BrobeilGeneral Pathology and Pathological Anatomy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Vitali KochInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Götz M RichterClinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Philippe L PereiraClinic for Radiology, Minimally-Invasive Therapies and Nuclearmedicine, SLK-Kliniken GmbH, Heilbronn, Germany.
Hans U KauczorClinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christof M SommerClinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. cmsommer@gmx.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7953-8481
Heidelberg University · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinikum Stuttgart · DESLK-Kliniken Heilbronn · DEUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present a preclinical in vivo approach for standardization and training of lymphangiography and lymphatic interventions using a pictorial review. MATERIALS AND

methodsDifferent lipiodol- and gadolinium-based lymphangiography and lymphatic interventions were performed in twelve (12) landrace pigs with a mean bodyweight of 34 ± 2 kg using various imaging and guiding modalities, similar to the procedures used in humans. The techniques used were explicitly introduced and illustrated. The potential applications of each technique in preclinical training were also discussed.

resultsBy applying visual, ultrasonography, fluoroscopy, CT, cone-beam CT, and/or MRI examination or guidance, a total of eleven techniques were successfully implemented in twelve pigs. The presented techniques include inguinal postoperative lymphatic leakage (PLL) establishment, interstitial dye test, five types of lymphangiography [incl. lipiodol-based translymphatic lymphangiography (TL), lipiodol-based percutaneous intranodal lymphangiography (INL), lipiodol-based laparotomic INL, lipiodol-based interstitial lymphangiography, and interstitial magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL)], and four types of percutaneous interventions in the treatment of PLL [incl. thoracic duct embolization (TDE), intranodal embolization (INE), afferent lymphatic vessel sclerotherapy (ALVS), and afferent lymphatic vessel embolization (ALVE)].

conclusionThis study provides a valuable resource for inexperienced interventional radiologists to undergo the preclinical training in lymphangiography and lymphatic interventions using healthy pig models.

Indexed as

Animal ModelLymphatic InterventionLymphographyPostoperative Lymphatic LeakagePreclinical Training

Identifiers

PMID36995443
PMCPMC10063775
OpenAlexW4361275617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.