High-Quality Data Collection in Low-Resource Settings: An Imperative to Improving Global Surgical Care.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Managing Japanese Encephalitis Virus as a Veterinary Infectious Disease Through Animal Surveillance and One Health Control Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Review
2. SDMPH 10-year Anniversary Conference Modified Delphi Study.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2024
   Article
3. A Global Call for More Investment in Data-Driven Perioperative Care Delivery Models in Humanitarian Settings.World journal of surgery · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Indications, Challenges, and Characteristics of Successful Implementation of Perioperative Registries in Low Resource Settings: A Systematic Review.2023

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as