Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995374›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2023

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection by vaccination status, predominant variant and time from prior infection: a cohort study, Reggio Emilia province, Italy, February 2020 to February 2022.

Massimo Vicentini, Francesco Venturelli, Pamela Mancuso, Eufemia Bisaccia, Alessandro Zerbini, Marco Massari, Andrea Cossarizza, Sara De Biasi, Patrizio Pezzotti, Emanuela Bedeschi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Massimo VicentiniEpidemiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Francesco VenturelliEpidemiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Pamela MancusoEpidemiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Eufemia BisacciaPublic Health Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Alessandro ZerbiniUnit of Clinical Immunology, Allergy and Advanced Biotechnologies, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Marco MassariInfectious Disease Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Andrea CossarizzaNational Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Bologna, Italy.
Sara De BiasiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia School of Medicine, Modena, Italy.
Patrizio PezzottiDipartimento Malattie Infettive, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Emanuela BedeschiPublic Health Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Paolo Giorgi RossiEpidemiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Reggio Emilia COVID-19 Working GroupThe working group members are listed under Collaborators.
Members of the Reggio Emilia COVID-19 Working group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding the epidemiology of reinfections is crucial for SARS-CoV-2 control over a long period.AimTo evaluate the risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection by vaccination status, predominant variant and time after first infection.MethodsWe conducted a cohort study including all residents in the Reggio Emilia province on 31 December 2019, followed up until 28 February 2022 for SARS-CoV-2 first infection and reinfection after 90 days. Cox models were used to compare risk of first infection vs reinfection, adjusting for age, sex, vaccine doses and comorbidities.ResultsThe cohort included 538,516 residents, 121,154 with first SARS-CoV-2 infections and 3,739 reinfections, most in the Omicron BA.1 period. In the pre-Omicron period, three doses of vaccine reduced risk of reinfection by 89% (95% CI: 87-90), prior infection reduced risk by 90% (95% CI: 88-91), while two doses and infection reduced risk by 98% (95% CI: 96-99). In the Omicron BA.1 period, protection estimates were 53% (95% CI: 52-55), 9% (95% CI: 4-14) and 76% (95% CI: 74-77). Before Omicron, protection from reinfection remained above 80% for up to 15 months; with Omicron BA.1, protection decreased from 71% (95% CI: 65-76) at 5 months to 21% (95% CI: 10-30) at 22 months from the first infection. Omicron BA.1 reinfections showed 48% (95% CI: 10-57) lower risk of severe disease than first infections.ConclusionsNatural immunity acquired with previous variants showed low protection against Omicron BA.1. Combined vaccination and natural immunity seems to be more protective against reinfection than either alone. Vaccination of people with prior infection reduced the risk of severe disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Cohort StudiesHumansItalyReinfectionVaccinationEpidemiologyImmunityOmicronReinfectionSars-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36995374
PMCPMC10064646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.