Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995250›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023

Generating Protein Folding Trajectories Using Contact-Map-Driven Directed Walks.

Ziad Fakhoury, Gabriele C Sosso, Scott Habershon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Contact-Map-Driven Exploration of Heterogeneous Protein-Folding Paths.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziad FakhouryDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Gabriele C SossoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6156-7399
Scott HabershonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5932-6011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in machine learning methods have had a significant impact on protein structure prediction, but accurate generation and characterization of protein-folding pathways remains intractable. Here, we demonstrate how protein folding trajectories can be generated using a directed walk strategy operating in the space defined by the residue-level contact-map. This double-ended strategy views protein folding as a series of discrete transitions between connected minima on the potential energy surface. Subsequent reaction-path analysis for each transition enables thermodynamic and kinetic characterization of each protein-folding path. We validate the protein-folding paths generated by our discretized-walk strategy against direct molecular dynamics simulations for a series of model coarse-grained proteins constructed from hydrophobic and polar residues. This comparison demonstrates that ranking discretized paths based on the intermediate energy barriers provides a convenient route to identifying physically sensible folding ensembles. Importantly, by using directed walks in the protein contact-map space, we circumvent several of the traditional challenges associated with protein-folding studies, namely, long time scales required and the choice of a specific order parameter to drive the folding process. As such, our approach offers a useful new route for studying the protein-folding problem.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingProteinsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID36995250
PMCPMC10091407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.