ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023
Microbial Species-Area Relationships on the Skins of Amphibian Hosts.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpreting Microbial Species-Area Relationships: Effects of Sequence Data Processing Algorithms and Fitting Models.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Biotic interactions and environmental modifications determine symbiotic microbial diversity and stability.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Host traits rather than migration and molting strategies explain feather bacterial load in Palearctic passerines.iScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlike species-area relationships (SARs) that have been widely reported for plants and animals on Earth, there is no clear understanding of the SARs for microorganisms. In this study, 358 specimens of 10 amphibian host species collected from the rural Chengdu region of southwest China were selected as island models for evaluating SAR curve shapes and assessing the skin microbiota from different amphibian species. The results showed that skin microbial diversity, measured using Hill's number, presented significant differences between hosts, but the difference was insignificant between habitat-specific classifications of hosts. As for microbial SARs, other than the classical power-law (PL) model describing an expected steady increase in microbial diversity as sampled skin area increases, two additional trends were observed: (i) microbial diversity first rises and gradually decreases after reaching a maximum accrual diversity (MaxAD) and (ii) microbial diversity decreases and starts to rise after reaching the minimum accrual diversity (MinAD). Among the four SAR statistical models compared, it was consistently found that the models that can describe MaxAD were favorably selected in the highest frequency. Models that can describe MinAD and PL model also performed reasonably well. However, PL had the poorest fitting power, implying the necessity of introducing biologically meaningful complex SAR models in microbial diversity research. In conclusion, through multihost analyses, our study provided compelling evidence that microbial SARs are complex and nonlinear. A variety of ecological mechanisms may be used for explaining these, including, but not limited to, community saturation, small-island effects, or sampling heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.