Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36995207›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2023

The diagnostic value of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in missed hand tendon injuries.

Uğur Bezirgan, Erdinç Acar, Yasin Erdoğan, Mehmet Armangil

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Ultrasonographic evaluation of tendon injuries in hand trauma: a crucial tool for emergency care.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Uğur BezirganDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery Division, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara-Türkiye.
Erdinç AcarDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery Division, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara - Türkiye.
Yasin ErdoğanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery Division, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara - Türkiye.
Mehmet ArmangilDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery Division, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ankara-Türkiye.
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with hand tendon injuries may present to the hand surgery clinic in the late stage after being examined in emergency departments. Even if an approximate idea has been obtained in physical examination of these patients, diagnostic imaging is usually requested for reconstructive approach, correct planning of surgical incisions and medicolegal reasons. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the overall accuracy of Ultrasonography (USG) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in patients with late presentation of a tendon injury.

methodsThe surgical findings and imaging reports of 60 patients (32 females, 28 males) who underwent surgical exploration, late secondary tendon repair or reconstruction with a diagnosis of late-presenting tendon injury in our clinic were evaluated. Comparisons were made of 47 preoperative USG images (18-874 days) and 28 MRI (19-717 days) results for 39 extensor and 21 flexor tendon injuries. The imaging reports were interpreted as partial rupture, complete rupture, healed tendon and adhesion formation and these were compared with the surgical reports in terms of accuracy.

resultsIn extensor tendon injuries, the sensitivity and accuracy values were both 84% for USG and 44% and 47% for MRI, respec-tively. In flexor tendon injuries, the sensitivity and accuracy values were 100% for MRI and 50% and 53%, respectively, for USG. Of the 4 sensory nerve injuries, 4 were missed on USG and 1 on MRI. The results obtained with USG and MRI in the late-presenting patients in this study were lower than those reported in previous USG and MRI studies in the literature.

conclusionScar formation with tendon healing causes a change in anatomy, which could prevent accurate evaluation. There-fore, it would be beneficial for surgeons to start evaluating their patients with easily accessible ultrasonography; thus, surgical morbid-ity should be reduced.

Indexed as

Hand InjuriesTendon InjuriesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRuptureTendonsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36995207
PMCPMC10214892
OpenAlexW4361304479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.