ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2023
The Relation Between Students' Theoretical Knowledge and Practical Skills in Endodontics: Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Metronidazole, Chlorhexidine, and Normal Saline as Laser- and Sonic-Activated Intracanal Irrigants AgainstJMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Undergraduate Endodontic Teaching in Dental Schools Around the World: A Narrative Review.European endodontic journal · 2025Review
- Impact of hands-on workshops on future medical students' motivation, confidence, and career aspirations: an observational study.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Observational
- Illustration of self-perceived knowledge, skills, and interests in undergraduate dental students using a visual metaphor- results of a monocentric cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental undergraduate students are required to show sufficient practical skills prior to treating patients. Practical skills and the underlying theoretical knowledge are taught in preclinical courses. Usually, the learning outcome is assessed in written multiple-choice examinations (theoretical knowledge) and practical skills tests. However, students' assessment of practical skills is more time consuming and prone to bias than objective multiple-choice examinations.
objectiveThis study aims to analyze the relation between students' theoretical knowledge and practical skills in endodontics. Furthermore, the predictive validity of a theoretical knowledge assessment on students' practical skills was assessed.
methodsExamination results from all students who participated in the preclinical phantom course in Operative Dentistry (sixth semester of the undergraduate dental curriculum in Germany) between the 2015 summer term and the 2022 summer term were retrospectively evaluated (N=447). The effects of age, sex, previous course participation, and theoretical knowledge on students' practical skills were assessed, using Pearson correlations, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and a linear regression analysis. Subsequently, students' theoretical knowledge and practical skills were compared via a Fisher exact test to identify a suitable pass mark for students' theoretical knowledge that was associated with sufficient practical skills (≥60%).
resultsStudents' theoretical knowledge was significantly associated with practical skills (P
conclusionsStudents' practical skills and theoretical knowledge are significantly correlated. By objectively measuring students' theoretical knowledge, a rough estimation of students' practical skills (ie, a differentiation between sufficient and insufficient practical skills) is possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.