Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36994900›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2023

Combining primary tumor features derived from conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound facilitates the prediction of positive axillary lymph nodes in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 malignant breast lesions.

Yu Du, Chun-Bei Yi, Li-Wen Du, Hai-Yan Gong, Li-Jun Ling, Xin-Hua Ye, Min Zong, Cui-Ying Li

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu DuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6909-4357
Chun-Bei YiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6919-7233
Li-Wen DuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0124-6806
Hai-Yan GongDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2249-2195
Li-Jun LingDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7371-9572
Xin-Hua YeDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2679-3451
Min ZongDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0452-507X
Cui-Ying LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8633-791X
Jiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether the primary tumor features derived from conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) facilitate the prediction of positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) in breast cancer diagnosed as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4.

methodsA total of 240 women with breast cancer who underwent preoperative conventional US, strain elastography, and CEUS between September 2016 and December 2019 were included. The multiple parameters of the primary tumor were obtained, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to predict positive ALNs. Then three prediction models (conventional US features, CEUS features, and the combined features) were developed, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves.

resultsOn conventional US, the traits of large size and the non-circumscribed margin of the primary tumor were marked as two independent predictors. On CEUS, the features of vessel perforation or distortion and the enhanced range of the primary tumor were marked as two independent predictors for positive ALNs. Three prediction models were then developed: model A (conventional US features), model B (CEUS features), and model C (model A plus B). Model C yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.88] compared with model A (AUC 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.81;

conclusionCEUS, as a non-invasive examination technique, can be used to predict ALN metastasis. Combining conventional US and CEUS may produce favorable predictive accuracy for positive ALNs in BI-RADS category 4 breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsUltrasonography, MammaryContrast MediaFemaleHumansLymph NodesUltrasonographyContrast Mediaaxillary lymph node metastasisBI-RADS categorybreast cancercontrast enhanced ultrasoundConventional ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36994900
PMCPMC10679605
OpenAlexW4316037185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.