Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36994656›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2023

Optimising plasma clozapine levels to improve treatment response: an individual patient data meta-analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Korinne Northwood, E Pearson, U Arnautovska, S Kisely, M Pawar, M Sharma, K Vitangcol, E Wagner, N Warren, Dan Siskind

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vaccination and clozapine use: a systematic review and an analysis of the VAERS database.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Real-world comprehensive care of people living with schizophrenia: recommendations across different settings and clinical stages.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Korinne NorthwoodMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Metro South Health, Australia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia.
E PearsonCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Australia.
U ArnautovskaMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Metro South Health, Australia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia.
S KiselyMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Metro South Health, Australia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4021-2924
M PawarMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Metro South Health, Australia.
M SharmaDepartment of Mental Health, Monash Health, Australia.
K VitangcolFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia.
E WagnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
N WarrenMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Metro South Health, Australia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia.
Dan SiskindMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Metro South Health, Australia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2072-9216
The University of Queensland · AUFlinders University · AULMU Klinikum · DEMetro South Health · AUMonash Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough clozapine is the most efficacious medication for treatment-refractory schizophrenia, not all patients will have an adequate response. Optimising clozapine dose using therapeutic drug monitoring could therefore maximise response.

aimsUsing individual patient data, we undertook a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine an optimal therapeutic range for clozapine levels to guide clinical practice.

methodWe conducted a systematic review of PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase for studies that provided individual participant level data on clozapine levels and response. These data were analysed using ROC curves to determine the prediction performance of plasma clozapine levels for treatment response.

resultsWe included data on 294 individual participants from nine studies. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.612. The clozapine level at the point of optimal diagnostic benefit was 372 ng/mL; at this level, the response sensitivity was 57.3%, and specificity 65.7%. The interquartile range for treatment response was 223-558 ng/mL. There was no improvement in ROC performance with mixed models including patient gender, age or length of trial. Clozapine dose and clozapine concentration to dose ratio did not provide significantly meaningful prediction of response to clozapine.

conclusionsClozapine dose should be optimised based on clozapine therapeutic levels. We found that a range between 250 and 550 ng/mL could be recommended, while noting that a level of >350 ng/mL is the most optimal for response. Although some patients may not respond without clozapine levels >550 ng/mL, the benefits should be weighed against the increased risk of adverse drug reactions.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsClozapineSchizophreniaHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesROC CurveAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineClozapineindividual patient data meta-analysisoptimisationROC curvetherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36994656
PMCPMC10201335
OpenAlexW4361279722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.