Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36994453›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

Nebulised interferon-β1a (SNG001) in hospitalised COVID-19: SPRINTER phase III study.

Phillip D Monk, Jody L Brookes, Victoria J Tear, Toby N Batten, Marcin Mankowski, Tatjana Adzic-Vukicevic, Michael G Crooks, Davinder P S Dosanjh, Monica Kraft, Christopher E Brightling and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Immunity and Coagulation in COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Phillip D MonkSynairgen Research Ltd, Southampton, UK.
Jody L BrookesSynairgen Research Ltd, Southampton, UK.
Victoria J TearSynairgen Research Ltd, Southampton, UK.
Toby N BattenVeramed, Twickenham, UK.
Marcin MankowskitranScrip Ltd, Wokingham, UK.
Tatjana Adzic-VukicevicUniversity Clinical Center of Serbia, COVID Hospital Batajnica, Belgrade, Serbia.
Michael G CrooksRespiratory Research Group, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK.
Davinder P S DosanjhBirmingham and West Midlands Lung Research Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-5607
Monica KraftDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Christopher E BrightlingInstitute for Lung Health, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Felicity J GabbaytranScrip Ltd, Wokingham, UK.
Stephen T HolgateNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ratko DjukanovicNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Tom M A WilkinsonNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBSynairgen (United Kingdom) · GBCenter for Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences · RSUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the availability of vaccines and therapies, patients are being hospitalised with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Interferon (IFN)-β is a naturally occurring protein that stimulates host immune responses against most viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. SNG001 is a recombinant IFN-β1a formulation delivered to the lungs Methods: Patients were randomised double-blind to SNG001 (n=309) or placebo (n=314) once daily for 14 days plus standard of care (SoC). The primary objective was to evaluate recovery after administration of SNG001 Results: Median time to hospital discharge was 7.0 and 8.0 days with SNG001 and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio (HR) 1.06 (95% CI 0.89-1.27); p=0.51); time to recovery was 25.0 days in both groups (HR 1.02 (95% CI 0.81-1.28); p=0.89). There were no significant SNG001-placebo differences for the key secondary end-points, with a 25.7% relative risk reduction in progression to severe disease or death (10.7% and 14.4%, respectively; OR 0.71 (95% CI 0.44-1.15); p=0.161). Serious adverse events were reported by 12.6% and 18.2% patients with SNG001 and placebo, respectively. Conclusions: Although the primary objective of the study was not met, SNG001 had a favourable safety profile, and the key secondary end-points analysis suggested that SNG001 may have prevented progression to severe disease.

Identifiers

PMID36994453
PMCPMC9790107
OpenAlexW4312190828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.