Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36994342›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2021

A Survey on the Current Status of Ophthalmological Consultations in Patients With Diabetes Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis and the Effectiveness of Education on Consultation Behavior -Experience of a Single Hemodialysis Clinic in Japan.

Moritsugu Kimura, Masao Toyoda, Nobumichi Saito, Makiko Abe, Eri Kato, Akemi Sugihara, Naoto Ishida, Masafumi Fukagawa

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Moritsugu KimuraSeichi Clinic, Isehara, Japan.
Masao ToyodaSeichi Clinic, Isehara, Japan.
Nobumichi SaitoDivision of Nephrology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Makiko AbeDivision of Nephrology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Eri KatoSeichi Clinic, Isehara, Japan.
Akemi SugiharaSeichi Clinic, Isehara, Japan.
Naoto IshidaSeichi Clinic, Isehara, Japan.
Masafumi FukagawaDivision of Nephrology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Tokai University · JPTomitahama Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: It is extremely important for patients with diabetes undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) to receive regular ophthalmologic examinations. However, even in the field of MHD in Japan, where there are many hemodialysis patients and the survival rate is said to be one of the highest in the world, we often see patients with diabetes who do not receive regular ophthalmologic examinations. In this study, we surveyed the status of ophthalmology consultations and the use of diabetic eye notebook (DEN) among hemodialysis patients with diabetes at hemodialysis clinics to confirm the current situation, with the aim of confirming the effectiveness of education on consultation behavior by medical care staff. Materials and Methods: This study included 38 diabetic hemodialysis patients attending one MHD clinic in Japan for one year from March 2018 to March 2019. In the first fact-finding survey in March 2018, hemodialysis care unit nurses (HCUNs) in the hemodialysis unit asked the diabetic hemodialysis patients whether they had consulted an ophthalmologist and used the DEN. Based on the results, the HCUNs recommended that hemodialysis patients with complications of diabetes be educated about the usefulness of regular ophthalmologic examinations, even during MHD, and that they use the DEN. This was followed by a second fact-finding survey in March 2019 to reconfirm ophthalmology consultations and DEN use. Results: Regarding the presence of ophthalmology consultations, 22 of 38 (58%) patients had regular ophthalmology consultations in March 2018, and 27 of 38 (71%) patients had consultations in the following year after receiving information from an HCUN. Only 1 of 22 patients (5%) who consulted the ophthalmologist in March 2018 used a DEN, but 19 of 27 patients (70%) used it the following year. Conclusion: In the future, the development and utilization of a new DEN that includes more detailed patient information, and the spread of self-care guidance to patients by multidisciplinary health care professionals, will increase the consultation rate of MHD patients in Japan and reduce the incidence and progression of ocular diseases in MHD patients.

Indexed as

diabetic patienteducationhemodialysisophthalmological consultationpatient involvementself-care

Identifiers

PMID36994342
PMCPMC10012105
OpenAlexW4210416768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read16
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.