Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36994339›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2021

Pregnancy Complications, Correlation With Placental Pathology and Neonatal Outcomes.

Maria Teresa Loverro, Edoardo Di Naro, Vittorio Nicolardi, Leonardo Resta, Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia, Federico Schettini, Manuela Capozza, Matteo Loverro, Giuseppe Loverro, Nicola Laforgia

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. BRIDGING COTYLEDON PATHOLOGY AND PERFUSION IN HEALTHY PRIMATE PREGNANCY.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mycoestrogen Exposure during Pregnancy: Impact of theEnvironmental health perspectives · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria Teresa LoverroDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Section of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Edoardo Di NaroDepartment Interdisciplinary Medicine, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Vittorio NicolardiDepartment of Economics and Finance University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Leonardo RestaDepartment Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Institute of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Salvatore Andrea MastroliaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale dei Bambini "Vittore Buzzi", University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Federico SchettiniDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Section of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Manuela CapozzaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Section of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Matteo LoverroDepartment of Women and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe LoverroDepartment Interdisciplinary Medicine, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Nicola LaforgiaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Section of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to clarify and contribute to a better comprehension of associations and correlations between placental histological findings, pregnancy evolution, and neonatal outcomes. Study Design: This is a longitudinal and prospective observational study, performed between May 2015 and May 2019, on 506 pregnant women. Clinical data related to pregnancy outcome, neonatal health status, and placental histology were primarily collected. Twin pregnancies or malformed newborns were excluded and therefore the study was conducted on 439 cases. These cases have been then subdivided into the following study groups: (a) 282 placentas from pathological pregnancies; and, (b) a control group of 157 pregnancies over 33 weeks of gestational age, defined as physiological or normal pregnancies due to the absence of maternal, fetal, and early neonatal pathologies, most of which had undergone elective cesarean section for maternal or fetal indication. Results: A normal placenta was present in 57.5% of normal pregnancies and in 42.5% of pathological pregnancies. In contrast, placental pathology was present in 26.2% of normal pregnancies and 73.8% of pathological pregnancies. Comparison of the neonatal health status with the pregnancy outcome showed that, among the 191 newborns classified as normal, 98 (51.3%) were born from a normal pregnancy, while 93 (48.7%) were born from mothers with a pathological pregnancy. Among the 248 pathological infants, 59 (23.8%) were born from a mother with a normal pregnancy, while 189 (76.2%) were born from pregnancies defined as pathological. Conclusion: Placental histology must be better understood in the context of natural history of disease. Retrospective awareness of placental damage is useful in prevention in successive pregnancy, but their early identification in the evolving pregnancy could help in association with biological markers or more sophisticated instruments for early diagnosis.

Indexed as

great obstetrical syndromeshigh-risk pregnancylow-risk pregnancyneonatal outcomeplacenta

Identifiers

PMID36994339
PMCPMC10012052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read629
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.