Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36994305›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The 1-2-3 cm Advancement Flap Rule in Scalp Reconstruction.

Hani Shash, Sawsan Marzouq, Abdulrahman Alghamdi, Majd Alrayes, Saud K Alkhaldi, Hayam Shash, Ahmed M Abu Quren

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Effect of Adding an Incision to the Galea during Scalp Defect Closure.Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hani ShashPlastic Surgery, King Fahad University Hospital, Al Khobar, SAU.
Sawsan MarzouqPlastic Surgery, King Fahad University Hospital, Al Khobar, SAU.
Abdulrahman AlghamdiMedicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Majd AlrayesMedicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Saud K AlkhaldiMedicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Hayam ShashPlastic Surgery, King Fahad University Hospital, Al Khobar, SAU.
Ahmed M Abu QurenMedicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Defects of the scalp are surgically challenging for several reasons: anatomical convexity limits tissue displacement, resistance to advancement is different at different points on the scalp, and there is also interindividual variation. For many patients, the idea of undergoing an advanced surgery such as a free flap is not preferred. Hence, a simple technique with a favorable outcome is needed. We hereby introduce our new technique: the 1-2-3 scalp advancement rule. Objectives The objective of this study is to discover a novel way to reconstruct scalp defects secondary to trauma or cancer, without having the patient undergo a big procedure. Material and Methods A total of nine cadaveric heads were used to test the idea of achieving greater advancement and increased scalp mobility to cover a 4×8 cm-sized defect using our proposed 1-2-3 scalp rule. Three steps performed were advancement flap, galeal scoring, and removal of the outer table of the skull. The measurement of advancement was recorded after each step, and the results were analyzed. Results The mobility of the scalp was calculated from the sagittal midline with identical arcs of rotation. With zero tension, we found that the total distance of advancement with a flap had a mean of 9.78 mm, while the advancement for the same flap after galeal scoring had a mean of 20.5 mm, and after removing the outer table, the mean advancement was 30.2 mm. Conclusion To create a tension-free closure necessary for optimal outcome for scalp defects, our study showed that increased distances were possible using galeal scoring and outer table removal, increasing the distance of advancement by 10.63 mm and 20.42 mm, respectively.

Indexed as

galea scoreplastic surgeryscalp defectsscalp reconstructiontissue expansion

Identifiers

PMID36994305
PMCPMC10042496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.