ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
State, trait, and accumulated features of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) in mild Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of 5 and 10 mg donepezil in improving cognitive function in patients with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Personalized Hippocampal Network-Targeted Stimulation in Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Clinical impact of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of studies using ADNI data (2023 to June 2025).Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Article
- Exploring the potential of digital biomarkers as a measure of brain health 'capital'.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Brain network dynamics in patients with single- and multiple-domain amnestic mild cognitive impairment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Alzheimer's disease: a review on the current trends of the effective diagnosis and therapeutics.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Review
- Cortical activation in elderly patients with Alzheimer's disease dementia during working memory tasks: a multichannel fNIRS study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- Mechanistic Intimate Insights into the Role of Hydrogen Sulfide in Alzheimer's Disease: A Recent Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- State, trait, and accumulated features of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) in mild Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) is used to assess decline in memory, language, and praxis in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: A latent state-trait model with autoregressive effects was used to determine how much of the ADAS-Cog item measurement was reliable, and of that, how much of the information was occasion specific (state) versus consistent (trait or accumulated from one visit to the next). Results: Participants with mild AD ( Conclusions: Although the ADAS-Cog was designed to track cognitive decline, most items were unreliable, and each item captured different amounts of information related to occasion-specific, trait, and accumulated effects of AD over time. These latent properties complicate the interpretation of trends seen in ordinary statistical analyses of trials and other clinical studies with repeated ADAS-Cog item measures. Highlights: Studies have described unfavorable psychometric properties of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), bringing into question its ability to track changes in cognition uniformly over time. There remains a need to estimate how much of the ADAS-Cog measurement is reliable, of that how much is occasion specific versus consistent, and of the consistent information, how much represents enduring traits versus autoregressive effects (i.e., effects of Alzheimer's disease [AD] progression carried over from one assessment to the next).A latent state-trait model with autoregressive effects in mild AD found most items to be unreliable, and each item to capture different amounts of occasion-specific, trait, and autoregressive information. Language items, specifically, naming and the memory item word recall, were the most reliable.Psychometric idiosyncrasies of individual items complicate the interpretation of their summed score, biasing ordinary statistical analyses of repeated measures in mild AD. Future studies should consider item trajectories individually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.