Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36994225›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Analysis of factors influencing the distribution of 131-I in combined treatment of Licartin with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in primary hepatic carcinoma.

Ming Tang, Wen-Liang Li, Jia-Yu Li, Juan Lv, Fu-Kun Chen, Jia-Lun Zhu, Peng-Jie Liu

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ming TangDepartment of Pathology, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Wen-Liang LiDepartment of Pathology, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Jia-Yu LiDepartment of Nuclear Medical, The First People's Hospital of Zhaotong City, Zhaotong, China.
Juan LvDepartment of Nuclear Medical, The Cancer Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Fu-Kun ChenDepartment of Nuclear Medical, The Cancer Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Jia-Lun ZhuDepartment of Nuclear Medical, The Cancer Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Peng-Jie LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medical, The Cancer Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Kunming Medical University · CNFirst People's Hospital of Yunnan Province · CNKunming University of Science and Technology · CNThe First People's Hospital of Zhaoqing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the factors influencing the distribution of 131-I in the liver of patients with advanced hepatic carcinoma treated with the combination of Licartin ( Methods: Data from 41 patients with advanced hepatic carcinoma treated with the combination of Licartin and TACE in the Interventional Department of our hospital from March 2014 to December 2020 were collected. This included general characteristics, history of open and interventional surgery, interval between the last interventional surgery and the Licartin treatment, selected arteries in the Licartin perfusion, and 131-I distribution in the liver. Regression analysis was conducted to investigate the factors affecting the distribution of Results: In 14 cases (34.1%), 131-I was evenly distributed in the liver, and there was no correlation between the cause of even distribution with age(OR=0.961, P = 0.939), previous open surgery history(OR=3.547,P= 0.128), previous history of interventional therapy(OR=0.140,P = 0.072), the interval between the last interventional surgery and the Licartin treatment(OR=0.858,P = 0.883), or the choice of the perfusion artery in the Licartin treatment (OR=1.489,P = 0.419). In 14 cases (34.1%), there was higher aggregation in the tumor than in the normal liver, which was related to previous interventional surgery (OR=7.443,P = 0.043). In 13 cases (31.7%), there was lower aggregation in the tumor than in the normal liver, which was related to the selected vessels in the Licartin perfusion (OR=0.23,P = 0.013). Conclusion: The effective aggregation of 131-I in the liver, even in tumors, the previous history of TACE, and the choice of vessels in the Licartin infusion might be the factors influencing the distribution of 131-I in the liver during hepatic artery infusion of Licartin in combination with TACE therapy.

Indexed as

131-Icombined treatmentHepatocellular carcinomaLicartin (131I Metuximab)transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID36994225
PMCPMC10040873
OpenAlexW4324089150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read19
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.