Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36994131›Full record

ReviewAnnals of nuclear cardiology2021

Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Myocardial Flow Reserve Versus Pressure-wire Based Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Osamu Manabe, Tadao Aikawa, Masanao Naya, Shiro Miura, Noriko Oyama-Manabe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of nuclear cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Osamu ManabeDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Tadao AikawaDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Masanao NayaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Shiro MiuraDepartment of Cardiology, Hokkaido Ohno Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Noriko Oyama-ManabeDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) permits the noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF). Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), calculated by dividing stress MBF by rest MBF is a reliable index for the functional information of coronary artery disease. A pressure-derived physiological index, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) is also an important measurement. Both MFR and FFR values are used to evaluate coronary physiology; however, but they are not interchangeable because each test has certain discrepancies. In this systematic review, we provide an overview of coronary physiology with PET compared to pressure-derived physiological indices.

Indexed as

Coronary artery diseaseFractional flow reserveInstantaneous wave-free ratioMyocardial blood flowMyocardial flow reservePositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID36994131
PMCPMC10040938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.