ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
The yield of thyroid fine-needle aspiration in a primary care setting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The sensitivity and specificity of fine needle aspiration cytology in detecting thyroid malignancy according to Bethesda system at a teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Prevalence of malignancy in thyroid nodules with AUS cytopathology: A retrospective cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thyroid cancer is the second most common cancer among women. This study was conducted to assess the yield of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of thyroid nodules in a primary care setting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, primary care patients of both genders with thyroid nodules who underwent FNA above the age of 18 years were enrolled. Patients with a prior history of cancer were excluded. The data was collected from the histopathology reports of FNAs done for thyroid nodules from January 01, 2002 to July 31, 2018. Results: We enrolled 263 patients in this study. The mean age of the study population was 41.3 years old (Standard deviation (SD) ± 10.1), 81.7% were females and 18.3% were males. The rate of abnormal ultrasound (US) was 16%. The mean thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level was 2.3 mU/L (SD ± 5.9). Post-thyroidectomy, 17.5% had carcinoma on pathology reports. Among those who were diagnosed with thyroid cancer, 76.2% had papillary thyroid cancer, 21.4% had follicular thyroid cancer, and 2.4% had medullary thyroid cancer. The mean age for cancer diagnosis was 40 years old (SD ± 8). There was no significant association between FNA findings (benign/malignant) and age, gender, history of smoking, size of the nodule, or TSH level. Conclusion: Thorough investigations including FNA should be considered for patients presenting with suspicious thyroid nodules, regardless of their size or the patients' gender. Access to such investigations and referrals to specialists should be available for primary care physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.